Irregularities in proceedings

Irregularities in proceedings is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 14 cases from 2002 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Irregularities in proceedings, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers40.00% success rate10 cases71.4% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor100.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Dew Chambers0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Peter Low & Choo LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Leo Fernando LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Irregularities in proceedings, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Michael Quilindo0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Daphne Lim100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Daniel Koh100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Ramesh Tiwary0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Kang Kok Boon, Favian0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Afzal Ali100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Leong Wen Jia Nicholas0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Mohamed Niroze Idroos0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 14 most recent judgments out of 14 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code OffencesGeneral Division of the High Court24 Aug 2021
Appeal Allowed in Part
2VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
3Tan Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Unsoundness of Mind and Causation in MurderCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 May 2021
Appeal Dismissed
4Chander Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking ConvictionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 Jan 2021
Application dismissed summarily.
5-29 Jun 2020
Unknown
6Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Sexual Assault, Outrage of ModestyHigh Court29 Aug 2019
Accused acquitted on rape charge, convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty.
7Public Prosecutor v Ridhaudin Ridhwan: Rape, Attempted Rape, Sexual Penetration, Outrage of Modesty, Consent, Mistake of FactHigh Court22 Apr 2019
Accused 1 convicted on all charges; Accused 2 convicted on one charge and acquitted on another; Accused 3 convicted on all charges.
8PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
9Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & ProvocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
Accused convicted on the charge of attempted murder.
10Pram Nair v Public Prosecutor: Rape, Intoxication, and ConsentCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore24 Sep 2017
Appeal dismissed in part. Conviction affirmed. Sentence for rape affirmed; sentence for digital penetration reduced.
11Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
12Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing PrecedentsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Aug 2008
Appeal Allowed
13Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed v PP: Rioting with Deadly Weapons & Criminal IntimidationHigh Court17 Oct 2004
Appeals dismissed.
14Louis Pius Gilbert v PP: Grievous Hurt, Provocation, & Sentence EnhancementHigh Court12 Dec 2002
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence enhanced to ten years' imprisonment.