Ting Choon Meng
Ting Choon Meng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 83.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 83.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Ting Choon Meng has been represented by 5 law firms and 11 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
PRP Law | 1 case |
Peter Low LLC | 2 cases |
UniLegal LLC | 2 cases |
Bayfront Law LLC | 1 case |
Characterist LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ting Choon Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.2
- Complex Cases
- 5 (83.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 16.0 parties avg |
Won | 55.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 25.0 parties avg |
2021 | 15.0 parties avg |
2019 | 16.0 parties avg |
2017 | 17.0 parties avg |
2015 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ting Choon Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(16.7%) |
Won | 5(83.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 13,333.333 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 2 |
2021 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
17 May 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $40,000 (all-in) in favour of the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Jan 2022 | Defendant | WonThe defendants' application was dismissed. |
28 Oct 2021 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the defendant; costs to be paid by the plaintiffs. |
19 Feb 2019 | Plaintiff | LostApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed. |
15 Jan 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Dec 2015 | Appellant | WonAppeal against the decision of the District Judge was allowed. |