Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar

Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar has been represented by 2 law firms and 13 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 case	Jaikanth Shankar Gerald Paul Seah Davinder Singh Jaspreet Singh Sachdev
Niru & Co LLC	4 cases	Kanapathi Pillai Nirumalan Liew Teck Huat Niru Pillai Anand George Phang Cun Kuang Sean Lee Achala Menon Dafril Phua Izzad Dafril Phua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 2 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.0 parties avg	5.0	66.7%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	36.0 parties avg	6.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	106,300.00	21,260.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-49 27 Feb 2023	27 Feb 2023	Claimant	WonInterim injunction granted restraining the defendant from bringing proceedings other than for breach of the second settlement agreement, until HC/S 821/2015 is disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2019-sgca-42 25 Jul 2019	25 Jul 2019	Appellant, Plaintiff	WonAppeal allowed; the respondent to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2018-sghc-90 16 Apr 2018	16 Apr 2018	Plaintiff, Applicant	LostApplication for anti-suit injunction dismissed; costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2018-sghc-87 15 Apr 2018	15 Apr 2018	Plaintiff	LostApplication to set aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction granted against Plaintiff; costs of $10,000 excluding disbursements were granted to the defendants, with disbursements to be determined. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2018-sghc-24 30 Jan 2018	30 Jan 2018	Defendant	LostApplication for removal of caveats allowed against the defendant.
6	2017-sghc-120 25 May 2017	25 May 2017	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; costs in respect of Registrar's Appeal No 13 to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, to be taxed if not agreed. No order as to costs for Registrar's Appeal No 31. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.