Hin Tat Augustine & Partners

Hin Tat Augustine & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The firm has handled 27 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in banking law. Their track record shows a 40.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 25.9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	6 cases	8.2% of total caseload	Experienced62.50% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8.2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	8.2% of total caseload	Experienced69.17% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8.2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	5.5% of total caseload	General Practice27.27% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	5.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.22% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5.5% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	4.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.11% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4.1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	4.1% of total caseload	Experienced59.00% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4.1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	4.1% of total caseload	General Practice30.53% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4.1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2.7% of total caseload	Experienced56.00% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	2.7% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Hin Tat Augustine & Partners has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 10 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gong Chin Nam	10 cases	37.0% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 343(Dec 2023) 2022 sghc 129(May 2022) 2018 sghc 65(Mar 2018)
Sean Lim Thian Siong	7 cases	25.9% of firm's cases	2017 sghcr 4(Apr 2017) 2015 sghc 214(Aug 2015) 2014 sghc 263(Dec 2014)
Sean Lim	6 cases	22.2% of firm's cases	2013 sghc 51(Feb 2013) 2012 sghc 94(May 2012) 2010 sghc 155(May 2010)
Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil	4 cases	14.8% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 102(Apr 2024) 2022 sghc 129(May 2022) 2017 sgcai 1(May 2017)
Zikri Muzammil	2 cases	7.4% of firm's cases	2021 sghcf 30(Aug 2021) 2017 sghcr 7(May 2017)
Lim Kia Tong	2 cases	7.4% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 211(Sep 2019) 2017 sghc 80(Apr 2017)
Cheong Yuen Hee	2 cases	7.4% of firm's cases	2017 sgcai 1(May 2017) 2017 sghci 2(Feb 2017)
Chuah Hui Fen Christine	1 cases	3.7% of firm's cases	2021 sghcf 30(Aug 2021)
Lim Thian Siong Sean	1 cases	3.7% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 90(Apr 2017)
Andrew Hill	1 cases	3.7% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 65(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hin Tat Augustine & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 7 (25.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	122.9 parties avg	2.9	44.4%
Won	113.4 parties avg	3.4	40.7%
Dismissed	23.3 parties avg	3.3	7.4%
Partial	28.6 parties avg	8.6	7.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	47.7 parties avg	7.7
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	64.6 parties avg	4.6
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hin Tat Augustine & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(44.4%)	44.4%
Won	11(40.7%)	40.7%
Dismissed	2(7.4%)	7.4%
Partial	2(7.4%)	7.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19865559.49	709484.2714 cases	14
USD	996999.15	332333.051 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2009	013 13	Partial: 1 cases (7.7%) Won: 3 cases (23.1%)
2010	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2014	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	0141 141	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.7%) Lost: 4 cases (2.8%) Won: 1 cases (0.7%)
2018	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	01 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Hin Tat Augustine & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Teo Wai CheongAppellant, Defendant Won (2)Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	4 cases	Won (2)Lost (2)
Jacob AgamAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Ruth AgamAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Family Podiatry Centre Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Ng Choong Keong StevenDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ehub Pte LtdDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
VTLPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Ho Mei Xia HannahAppellant, Applicant Lost (1)	Appellant, Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Lu LingPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation LimitedPlaintiff, Applicant Dismissed (1)	Plaintiff, Applicant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Lalwani Ashok BherumalDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
SUM CHONG MUNRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Singapura Finance LtdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Suresh s/o SuppiahAppellant, Plaintiff Won (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
ECICS LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Jip SengDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Michael Heng Swee HaiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
IFS Capital LimitedDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Nadarajan a/l IyavooDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Goh Guan ChongPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Jennifer Yap Beng ChooDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Hong Suan CeciliaDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Veronica Siah Hua Li nee Yap Hua LiDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yap Beng Sek Jerene @ Mrs William Henry HernstadtDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yap Hock Hin GeraldDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yap JosephineDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yap Keng Siang GeraldDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yap Mei Li PatriciaDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Kim Eng Securities Pte LtdPlaintiff, Appellant Partial (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
New Health International, IncPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Kek Kim HokThird Party Lost (1)	Third Party	1 case	Lost (1)