Adrian Tan

Type of Practice: General Practice
Total Cases Handled: 63 judgments

Adrian Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 63 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 13 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and defamation. Their track record shows a 51.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 31 complex cases, representing 49% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Adrian Tan has demonstrated expertise across 216 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	48 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 48 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	31 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 31 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	20 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 20 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	14 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	14 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	13 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separate legal personality	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Brokerage Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effective Cause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bill of costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unilateral mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legitimate expectations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Benefit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Memorandum and articles of association	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and bonds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money had and received	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Promissory Notes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privileges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-reliance clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Franchise Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
No-Assignment Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of oral agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Novation Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Blackmail	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Leave of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distribution Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of Writ	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunction to Restrain Winding-Up Petition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Subscription and Option Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Earnest Money	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vendor's Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Takeover	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Metal Commodities Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpleader Relief	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Urology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infertility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prima Facie Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Authority of Agent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside default judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statement of Affairs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Adrian Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Adrian Tan has been affiliated with 13 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	21 cases	33% of cases	Sarawak Timber v Asia Pulp: Enforcement of Malaysian Judgment on Unpaid Share Capital(Nov 2013) Sarawak Timber v Asia Pulp: Setting Aside Registration Order Under RECJA(Mar 2013) Koh Chong Chiah v Treasure Resort: Breach of Membership Terms in Sijori Resort Club(Nov 2012)
TSMP Law Corporation	11 cases	17% of cases	Phua Kiah Mai v The Kheng Chiu Tin Hou Kong: Winding Up for Unfairness to Minority Members(Feb 2022) Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs(Jan 2022) On Line Mobile v Tan Mei Lian: Bankruptcy Application Stayed Due to Uncertain Share Value(Jun 2020)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	9 cases	14% of cases	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute(Dec 2018) Millenia Pte Ltd v Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd: Building Façade Defects and Liability(Sep 2018) Goh Seng Heng v Liberty Sky Investments: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Disclosure of Documents(Oct 2017)
Drew and Napier LLC	6 cases	10% of cases	Carona Holdings v Go Go Delicacy: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Act Interpretation(Jul 2008) Silberline Asia Pacific Inc v Lim Yong Wah Allan: Stay of Execution Pending Counterclaim(Feb 2006) Choo Kok Lin v The Management Corp: Strata Title Dispute over Condo By-Laws & Mandatory Injunction(Aug 2005)
Stamford Law Corporation	5 cases	8% of cases	Cassa di Risparmio v Rals: Stay of Action, Arbitration Agreement, Promissory Notes(Oct 2015) Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Aug 2015) Australian Property Group v H.A. & Chung: Director's Duties & Unpaid Share Capital(May 2015)
August Law Corporation	3 cases	5% of cases	Re Haeusler: Application for Leave to Act as Director Under Section 155A(3) of the Companies Act(Apr 2021) SAR Maritime v PCL Shipping: Brokerage Agreement, Termination, and Commission Dispute(Mar 2020) Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Mar 2016)
Drew & Napier	2 cases	3% of cases	Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy(Nov 2000) Tay Long Kee v Tan Beng Huwah: Passing-Off, Injunctions & Material Non-Disclosure in Trademark Dispute(Apr 2000)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	2% of cases	Jeyasegaram David v Ban Song Long David: Defamation, Fair Comment, and Qualified Privilege in NatSteel Takeover Battle(Apr 2005)
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act(Nov 2006)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	2% of cases	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes(Nov 2002)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	2% of cases	Evergreen International SA v Volkswagen Group: Anti-Suit Injunction & Limitation of Liability in Collision Case(Jun 2003)
Adrian Tan with Vanita Jegathesan	1 cases	2% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v Metalform Asia: Director's Access to Company Documents & Legal Privilege(Aug 2006)
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	Excalibur Group v Goh Boon Kok: Application for Leave to Sue Liquidator for Breach of Contract and Fraud(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Adrian Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.2
Complex Cases: 31 (49%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	2%
Lost	235.7 parties avg	5.7	37%
Partial	74.9 parties avg	4.9	11%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Won	336.8 parties avg	6.8	52%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2002	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	63.7 parties avg	3.7
2006	53.9 parties avg	3.9
2007	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2009	410.0 parties avg	10.0
2010	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2011	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	45.3 parties avg	5.3
2013	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	412.3 parties avg	12.3
2016	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	44.7 parties avg	4.7
2018	37.2 parties avg	7.2
2019	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2020	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2022	28.4 parties avg	8.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Adrian Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	23(35%)	35%
Partial	7(11%)	11%
Stayed	1(2%)	2%
Won	33(51%)	51%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	29,236,777.59	859,905.2234 cases	34
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2005	6 6	Won: 6 cases (100.0%)
2006	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2007	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2009	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2012	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2016	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2017	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2018	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Stayed: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 63 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Phua Kiah Mai v The Kheng Chiu Tin Hou Kong: Winding Up for Unfairness to Minority Members 22 Feb 2022 The Kheng Chiu Tin Hou Kong and Burial Ground (Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2022	The Kheng Chiu Tin Hou Kong and Burial Ground (Defendant): Winding-up order granted, stayed pending appealWinding-up order granted, but stayed pending appeal. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Then Feng v Contingent Creditors: Debtor's Bankruptcy Application and Statement of Affairs 02 Jan 2022 The Micro Tellers Network Limited (Respondent)Won	02 Jan 2022	The Micro Tellers Network Limited (Respondent): Successful OppositionSuccessfully opposed the bankruptcy application.
3	Re Haeusler: Application for Leave to Act as Director Under Section 155A(3) of the Companies Act 22 Apr 2021 Thomas Haeusler (Applicant)Lost	22 Apr 2021	Thomas Haeusler (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to act as director during the period of disqualification was dismissed. Costs were awarded against the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	On Line Mobile v Tan Mei Lian: Bankruptcy Application Stayed Due to Uncertain Share Value 29 Jun 2020 Neo Kian Soon (Defendant)Stayed	29 Jun 2020	Neo Kian Soon (Defendant): Bankruptcy application stayedBankruptcy application stayed until the value of Neo Kian Soon's shares has been determined.
5	SAR Maritime v PCL Shipping: Brokerage Agreement, Termination, and Commission Dispute 24 Mar 2020 SAR Maritime Agencies (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Mar 2020	SAR Maritime Agencies (Pvt) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; SAR to pay costs of $40,000 to PCL (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	WIH v WII: Appeal Against Taxation of Solicitors' Bills of Costs in Divorce Proceedings 09 Jan 2020 WIH (Appellant)Lost	09 Jan 2020	WIH (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that the Letter of Engagement was ambiguous and did not preclude taxation of the invoices. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Costs Dispute over Conspiracy and Breach of Contract 14 Mar 2019 Yeo Boong Hua (Plaintiff)Won	14 Mar 2019	Yeo Boong Hua (Plaintiff): Costs AwardedCosts of $435,500 awarded for the Four Hearings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute 30 Dec 2018 Royston Moh Tai Suan (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2018	Royston Moh Tai Suan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the second defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
9	Turf Club Auto Emporium v Yeo Boong Hua: Damages for Breach of Contract and Conspiracy 21 Nov 2018 Yeo Boong Hua (Respondent)Won	21 Nov 2018	Yeo Boong Hua (Respondent): Appeal WonThe respondent was awarded damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50, jointly and severally from the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Millenia Pte Ltd v Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd: Building Façade Defects and Liability 10 Sep 2018 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Third Party)Dismissed	10 Sep 2018	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Third Party): Claim DismissedClaim Dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
11	Goh Seng Heng v Liberty Sky Investments: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Disclosure of Documents 04 Oct 2017 Goh Seng Heng (Appellant, Defendant)Won	04 Oct 2017	Goh Seng Heng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the High Court's decision to allow LSI's application for disclosure of documents was allowed.
12	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 27 Jul 2017 Dr Goh Seng Heng (Respondent)Lost	27 Jul 2017	Dr Goh Seng Heng (Respondent): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted against Dr. Goh from disposing of assets in Singapore up to the cumulative value of the Sale Price, the stamp duties as well as the pleaded foreign exchange losses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Ramachandran Jayakumar v Woo Hon Wai: Collective Sale Approval & Good Faith Duty 08 May 2017 Simon Mahendran S/O Pakkirisamy (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	08 May 2017	Simon Mahendran S/O Pakkirisamy (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no monetary award specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Liberty Sky Investments Ltd v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Disclosure of Banking Documents in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 07 Feb 2017 Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant)Lost	07 Feb 2017	Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant): LostDr Goh's arguments against the grant of the application were not successful.
15	Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) v Ling Lee Soon: Bankruptcy & Jurisdiction Dispute 15 Nov 2016 Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	15 Nov 2016	Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera (Malaysia) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; bankruptcy order made against Ling Lee Soon (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Rals International v Cassa di Risparmio: Arbitration Stay & Promissory Notes 04 Sep 2016 Rals International Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Sep 2016	Rals International Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, meaning the stay of proceedings was not granted.
17	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit 14 Mar 2016 Tembusu Systems Pte Ltd (formerly known as Tembusu Terminals Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	14 Mar 2016	Tembusu Systems Pte Ltd (formerly known as Tembusu Terminals Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Search order set asideSearch order set aside; costs awarded to the Company fixed at $20,000 excluding disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	HT S.R.L. v Wee Shuo Woon: Legal Privilege, Confidentiality, and Admissibility of Hacked Communications 15 Feb 2016 HT SRL (Plaintiff)Won	15 Feb 2016	HT SRL (Plaintiff): Prayer to expunge grantedPrayer to expunge granted; costs of $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Cassa di Risparmio v Rals: Stay of Action, Arbitration Agreement, Promissory Notes 15 Oct 2015 Rals International Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Oct 2015	Rals International Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, stay of proceedings lifted. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 05 Aug 2015 Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff)Won	05 Aug 2015	Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedConsent Order set aside.
21	Australian Property Group v H.A. & Chung: Director's Duties & Unpaid Share Capital 28 May 2015 Australian Property Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 May 2015	Australian Property Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the defendants. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Choo Liang Haw v Chua Seet Mui: Collective Sale Dispute over Gilstead Court Penalty Clauses 12 Feb 2015 Loke Ah Meng (Defendant)Lost	12 Feb 2015	Loke Ah Meng (Defendant): Order for collective sale grantedOrder for collective sale granted, subject to striking out penalty clauses and modifying interest rate.
23	Zulaikha Bee v Quek Chek Khiang: Beneficial Ownership of Land Dispute 24 Aug 2014 Zulaikha Bee Binte Mohideen Abdul Kadir (Plaintiff)Won	24 Aug 2014	Zulaikha Bee Binte Mohideen Abdul Kadir (Plaintiff): Beneficial owner of 261 JCP and 261A JCPThe court declared the plaintiff the beneficial owner of 261 Joo Chiat Place and 261A Joo Chiat Place.
24	Sarawak Timber v Asia Pulp: Enforcement of Malaysian Judgment on Unpaid Share Capital 12 Nov 2013 Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Nov 2013	Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment was delivered in Singapore.
25	Sarawak Timber v Asia Pulp: Setting Aside Registration Order Under RECJA 26 Mar 2013 Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2013	Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent): Summons AllowedSummons to set aside the Registration Order was allowed.
26	Koh Chong Chiah v Treasure Resort: Breach of Membership Terms in Sijori Resort Club 28 Nov 2012 Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	28 Nov 2012	Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, discontinuing the suit for the 202 persons but without prejudice to their commencing action in their own right either in the High Court or in the Subordinate Courts.
27	Isabel Redrup Agency v Dakshnamoorthy: Striking Out Application in Commission & Defamation Claim 10 Jun 2012 Susan Eleanor Prior (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Jun 2012	Susan Eleanor Prior (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe striking out application was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
28	Tee Yok Kiat v Pang Min Seng: Trust, Blackmail, and Breach of Contract Claims 19 Apr 2012 Tee Yok Kiat (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Apr 2012	Tee Yok Kiat (Plaintiff): Trust and Blackmail Claims DismissedThe court found that the Trust Money and Blackmail Money were given as gifts, dismissing the claims.
29	Excalibur Group v Goh Boon Kok: Application for Leave to Sue Liquidator for Breach of Contract and Fraud 04 Apr 2012 Goh Boon Kok (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2012	Goh Boon Kok (Defendant): Application for Leave GrantedThe court granted the plaintiff leave to commence action against the defendant.
30	Kim Eng Securities v Goh Teng Poh: Dealer's Indemnity for Client Losses 06 Sep 2011 Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2011	Goh Teng Poh Karen (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for $512,004.89 (in respect of Julian) and for $703,878.65 (in respect of Goh) and for continuing interest on the principal amounts owing by both of them at the contractual rate of 9% per annum from 1 November 2009 until payment. Judgment also awarded for the legal costs incurred by the plaintiff in pursuing its claims against them in court at $8,731.70 (for Julian) and $8,043.14 (for Goh). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Lim Keenly Builders v Tokio Marine: Workmen's Compensation Policy Interpretation 29 Jun 2011 Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	29 Jun 2011	Lim Keenly Builders Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed.
32	Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Minority Oppression Suit 10 May 2011 Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	10 May 2011	Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Security for costs not orderedSecurity for costs not ordered. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Ng Joo Soon v Dovechem Holdings: Director Removal & Breach of Contract 17 Aug 2010 NG JOO SOON alias NGA JU SOON (Plaintiff)Won	17 Aug 2010	NG JOO SOON alias NGA JU SOON (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on all claims. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Mentormophosis v Phua Raymond: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Franchise Agreements 01 Jul 2010 Mentormophosis Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Jul 2010	Mentormophosis Pty Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Nanyang Law LLC v Alphomega Research Group Ltd: Setting Aside Default Judgment Based on Prima Facie Defence 29 Apr 2010 Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	29 Apr 2010	Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the decision of the learned assistant registrar was allowed. The court ordered that the costs order below was to remain and made no order as to costs in the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Cytec Industries v APP Chemicals: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt 05 Aug 2009 APP Chemicals International (Mau) Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	05 Aug 2009	APP Chemicals International (Mau) Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedRegistrar's Appeals dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Removal from Company Directorship 03 Jun 2009 Thio Syn Wee (Defendant)Won	03 Jun 2009	Thio Syn Wee (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	Tan Choon Yong v Goh Jon Keat: Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act 29 Apr 2009 Tan Choon Yong (Plaintiff)Won	29 Apr 2009	Tan Choon Yong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found that Dr. Tan was entitled to relief under s 216 of the Companies Act.
39	Cytec Industries v Asia Pulp & Paper: Corporate Guarantee, Consideration & Limitation Act 08 Feb 2009 Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Feb 2009	Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's defense was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
40	Thio Keng Poon v Malaysia Dairy Industries: Injunction Against Removal of Director 23 Dec 2008 Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Dec 2008	Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonApplication for injunction dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Wing Hak Man v Bio-Treat Technology: Forum Non Conveniens & Conspiracy 28 Sep 2008 Wing Hak Man (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2008	Wing Hak Man (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	Carona Holdings v Go Go Delicacy: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Act Interpretation 30 Jul 2008 Carona Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	30 Jul 2008	Carona Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; default judgment set aside.
43	Go Go Delicacy v Carona Holdings: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement 27 Sep 2007 Lee Boon Hiok (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2007	Lee Boon Hiok (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that a stay was impractical because not all defendants were party to the arbitration agreement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	Ong & Ong Architects v Yee Wei Chi: Summary Judgment & Closure of Pleadings After Adding New Party 04 Jul 2007 Yee Wei Chi (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2007	Yee Wei Chi (Defendant): Prayer two is struck outPrayer two is struck out against both plaintiffs, and the defendants are to file a new summons under O 18 r 19 against both plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute 12 Feb 2007 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Feb 2007	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
46	Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Defamation & Summary Judgment 30 Nov 2006 Lee Hsien Loong (Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2006	Lee Hsien Loong (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
47	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act 22 Nov 2006 Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Nov 2006	Yongnam Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial WinPartial win; entitled to relief based on proprietary estoppel.
48	Ser Kim Koi v Metalform Asia: Director's Access to Company Documents & Legal Privilege 30 Aug 2006 Ser Kim Koi (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Aug 2006	Ser Kim Koi (Plaintiff): Application DisallowedPlaintiff's application for access to documents was disallowed due to conflict of interest and legal privilege.
49	Van Der Horst Engineering v Rotol: Breach of Contract & Warranty in Share Subscription Agreement 23 Mar 2006 Rotol Singapore Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Mar 2006	Rotol Singapore Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedRotol's counterclaim was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
50	Silberline Asia Pacific Inc v Lim Yong Wah Allan: Stay of Execution Pending Counterclaim 15 Feb 2006 Silberline Asia Pacific Inc (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Feb 2006	Silberline Asia Pacific Inc (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against stay of execution allowed in part; stay of execution granted for US$1,785,247.65 of the judgment sum.
51	Fan Juan Fen v Crocodile Holdings: Share Transfer, Dividends & Fraud Allegations 25 Aug 2005 Fan Juan Fen (Plaintiff)Won	25 Aug 2005	Fan Juan Fen (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff. No specific monetary amount was awarded in this judgment extract. Assumed currency is Singapore Dollar (SGD) as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
52	Choo Kok Lin v The Management Corp: Strata Title Dispute over Condo By-Laws & Mandatory Injunction 10 Aug 2005 Choo Kok Lin (Appellant, Defendant)Won	10 Aug 2005	Choo Kok Lin (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed and the orders made below are set aside.
53	Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation, Fair Comment & Corporate Takeover 18 Jul 2005 Ban Song Long David (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2005	Ban Song Long David (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
54	Advantest v SL Link: Enforceability of Non-Competition Clause in Manufacturing Agreement 21 Apr 2005 Advantest Corporate Office (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2005	Advantest Corporate Office (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court granted the declaration and costs sought by the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
55	Jeyasegaram David v Ban Song Long David: Defamation, Fair Comment, and Qualified Privilege in NatSteel Takeover Battle 03 Apr 2005 Ban Song Long David (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2005	Ban Song Long David (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal, and was awarded the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
56	Chia Kok Leong v Prosperland: Developer's Right to Sue for Defects & Limitation Act Application 15 Mar 2005 Prosperland Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	15 Mar 2005	Prosperland Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision that Prosperland could claim substantial damages and that the claim for wall tile defects was not time-barred.
57	Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation Claim over NatSteel Shareholder Dispute 09 Nov 2004 Ban Song Long David (Defendant)Won	09 Nov 2004	Ban Song Long David (Defendant): Claim dismissedThe defamation claim against the defendant was dismissed.
58	Jeyasegaram David v Ban Song Long David: Defamation Claim over 'Playing to the Gallery' Remark 30 Sep 2004 Ban Song Long David (Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2004	Ban Song Long David (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's defamation claim was dismissed with costs to be agreed or taxed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
59	Prosperland v Civic Construction: Defective Condominium & Limitation Act 28 Jul 2004 Prosperland Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jul 2004	Prosperland Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentClaim for damages regarding external tiles is not time-barred; claim for glass blocks is time-barred.
60	Evergreen International SA v Volkswagen Group: Anti-Suit Injunction & Limitation of Liability in Collision Case 26 Jun 2003 Volkswagen Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2003	Volkswagen Group Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to set aside the Order for service of the Originating Summons out of jurisdiction is dismissedDefendants' application to set aside the Order for service of the Originating Summons out of jurisdiction is dismissed with no order as to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
61	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes 06 Nov 2002 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2002	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedFujitrans' application for a stay of proceedings regarding the Schedule 3 claim was dismissed.
62	Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy 23 Nov 2000 Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff)Partial	23 Nov 2000	Denis Matthew Harte (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partPartial judgment in favor of the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $32,995.62 (SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
63	Tay Long Kee v Tan Beng Huwah: Passing-Off, Injunctions & Material Non-Disclosure in Trademark Dispute 21 Apr 2000 Tay Long Kee Impex Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	21 Apr 2000	Tay Long Kee Impex Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to set aside the ex parte interlocutory injunction was dismissed.