Choo Poh Hua Josephine

Choo Poh Hua Josephine is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in performance bond and building and construction contracts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choo Poh Hua Josephine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choo Poh Hua Josephine has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract(Aug 2023) Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process(Jan 2022) Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages(Apr 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choo Poh Hua Josephine's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	80%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choo Poh Hua Josephine's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract 03 Aug 2023 Chian Teck Realty Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	03 Aug 2023	Chian Teck Realty Pte Ltd (Applicant): PartialOrder for second respondent to be restrained from making payment to first respondent pursuant to the claim on the bond made on 29 July 2022. First respondent is also restrained from claiming or directing second respondent to make said payment.
2	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process 04 Jan 2022 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jan 2022	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication by Range Construction Pte Ltd for injunctions against Goldbell and Etiqa is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages 08 Apr 2021 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	08 Apr 2021	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
4	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA 09 Sep 2020 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	09 Sep 2020	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedRange Construction's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.
5	Singapore Medical Council v. Looi Kok Poh: Professional Misconduct & Medical Leave 26 May 2019 Singapore Medical Council (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	26 May 2019	Singapore Medical Council (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Singapore Medical Council's appeal was dismissed.