Kenneth Tan

Kenneth Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 46 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 17 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 14 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Tan has demonstrated expertise across 183 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	36 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 36 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	13 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	13 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	11 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	10 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer Restrictions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
IT Key Man Dependency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Misdiagnosis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statistical Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionable transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quiet Enjoyment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expeditious Renewal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bonus	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery of Cargo	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time Bar Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collateral Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warehouseman Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Financing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gas Supply Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pledge of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Pledgee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of clause in deed	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Past consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Understanding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Intent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Covenants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alterations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Marks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frivolous complaints	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Switch Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Tan has been affiliated with 17 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 29 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kenneth Tan Partnership	29 cases	63% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions(Aug 2024) UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction(Nov 2023) Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Appeal on Particulars in Negligence, Breach of Contract, and Statutory Duty Claims(Sep 2023)
Sant Singh Partnership	2 cases	4% of cases	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute(Jun 2006) Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute(Aug 2003)
Christopher Bridges Law Corporation	1 cases	2% of cases	Terigi v Hook: Entire Agreement Clauses & Share Transfer Dispute in Singapore(Jan 2022)
M&A Law Corporation	1 cases	2% of cases	Sui Southern Gas v Habibullah Coastal Power: Gas Supply Agreement Dispute(Feb 2010)
Donaldson & Burkinshaw LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Causation in Misdiagnosis of Melanoma(Nov 2019)
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	Sembcorp Marine v PPL Holdings: Joint Venture Dispute over Share Transfer and Contractual Obligations(May 2012)
Gateway Law Corporation	1 cases	2% of cases	Muhlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity of Device for Inspecting Electronic Components(Feb 2009)
Ari, Goh & Partners	1 cases	2% of cases	iHub Solutions Pte Ltd v Freight Links Express Logisticentre Pte Ltd: Damages, Mitigation, Landlord and Tenant Covenants(Jan 2017)
Ng Chong & Hue LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim(Sep 2007)
Tito Isaac & Co	1 cases	2% of cases	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Air Waybill(Dec 2002)
Phua Wai Partnership	1 cases	2% of cases	Wee Poh Hueh Florence v Performance Motors Ltd: Breach of Warranty of Quality and Damages Assessment(Mar 2004)
Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee	1 cases	2% of cases	Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc: Breach of Contract & Failure of Consideration(Oct 2002)
Kenneth Tan Kong & Tan	1 cases	2% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore: Complaint Against Advocates and Solicitors(Aug 2000)
Kenneth CP Tan & Liew	1 cases	2% of cases	Ng Poh Guan v Chan Ai Leng: Breach of Contract & Unauthorised Renovation(Nov 2001)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	2% of cases	Accent Delight v Bouvier: Forum Non Conveniens & Conflict of Laws(Mar 2016)
Kenneth C P Tan & Liew	1 cases	2% of cases	Ng Poh Guan v Chan Ai Leng: Breach of Contract & Unauthorized Renovation(Nov 2001)
Oon & Bazul LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	S E Shipping Lines v Austral Asia Line: Winding-Up Application Dispute(Oct 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 14 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	2%
Lost	215.7 parties avg	5.7	46%
Neutral	33.3 parties avg	3.3	7%
Partial	72.8 parties avg	2.8	15%
Won	146.9 parties avg	6.9	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	73.8 parties avg	3.8
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	44.5 parties avg	4.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	59.8 parties avg	9.8
2007	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	33.6 parties avg	3.6
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	21(46%)	46%
Neutral	3(7%)	7%
Partial	7(15%)	15%
Won	14(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	681,390.00	32,447.1421 cases	21
USD	63,303,806.66	63,303,806.661 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	7 13111	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 3 cases (42.9%) Neutral: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 1 cases (14.3%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2006	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 46 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & Standard Chartered: Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transactions 20 Aug 2024 Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Aug 2024	Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Winson to pay costs to OCBC and SCB fixed at $200,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction 27 Nov 2023 UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Nov 2023	UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; UniCredit to pay costs of $100,000 to Glencore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Appeal on Particulars in Negligence, Breach of Contract, and Statutory Duty Claims 26 Sep 2023 Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2023	Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the trial judge.
4	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Striking Out Defenses in Guarantee Claim 29 Jan 2023 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant): Defenses Struck OutDefendant's defenses were struck out, and judgment was entered against them for USD 63,303,806.66 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in USD).
5	Terigi v Hook: Entire Agreement Clauses & Share Transfer Dispute in Singapore 24 Jan 2022 Lau Mei Ning (Defendant)Won	24 Jan 2022	Lau Mei Ning (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed.
6	Law Society v Lee Suet Fern: Legal Profession, Solicitor-Client Relationship, Professional Conduct, Breach 19 Nov 2020 Lee Suet Fern (Lim Suet Fern) (Respondent)Partial	19 Nov 2020	Lee Suet Fern (Lim Suet Fern) (Respondent): PartialThe court found the respondent guilty of misconduct unbefitting an advocate and solicitor and suspended her from practice for 15 months. The court did not find an implied retainer.
7	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Causation in Misdiagnosis of Melanoma 25 Nov 2019 Tan Hong Wui (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	25 Nov 2019	Tan Hong Wui (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part regarding the Breach Question and the Causation Question, but allowed in part regarding the Damages Question.
8	BOK v BOL: Setting Aside Declaration of Trust Due to Misrepresentation and Undue Influence 10 Dec 2017 BOM (Defendant)Lost	10 Dec 2017	BOM (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for declaration that the DOT is valid and for the plaintiff to be removed as trustee under the DOT was dismissed.
9	iHub Solutions Pte Ltd v Freight Links Express Logisticentre Pte Ltd: Damages, Mitigation, Landlord and Tenant Covenants 22 Jan 2017 FREIGHT LINKS EXPRESS LOGISTICENTRE PTE LTD (Defendant)Partial	22 Jan 2017	FREIGHT LINKS EXPRESS LOGISTICENTRE PTE LTD (Defendant): Judgment against the Defendant for the nominal sum of $100Judgment against the Defendant for the nominal sum of $100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Likpin International Ltd v Swiber Holdings Ltd: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Striking Out, and Costs 24 Jul 2016 LIKPIN INTERNATIONAL LTD (Appellant)Lost	24 Jul 2016	LIKPIN INTERNATIONAL LTD (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $50,000 inclusive of reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Accent Delight v Bouvier: Forum Non Conveniens & Conflict of Laws 16 Mar 2016 Tania Rappo (Defendant)Lost	16 Mar 2016	Tania Rappo (Defendant): Summons dismissedSummons filed by the defendant was dismissed. Costs to the plaintiffs to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Portigon v The "Titan Unity": Joinder of Third Parties and Consolidation of Disputes in International Arbitration 03 Feb 2014 Singapore Tankers (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2014	Singapore Tankers (Defendant): Application to set aside and strike out the writ is dismissedApplication to set aside and strike out the writ is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Brader v Commerzbank: Enforceability of Discretionary Bonus Promises & Contractual Obligations 06 Jan 2014 Daniel John Brader and others (Plaintiff)Won	06 Jan 2014	Daniel John Brader and others (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiffs' claim for breach of contract is allowed. The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiffs the bonuses declared on Letter Day, less the 10% that was paid out on 19 February 2009. In addition, pre-judgment interest at the rate of 5.33% per annum on these sums is to be paid to the Plaintiffs beginning 19 February 2009 and ending on the date of this decision. Costs are to follow the event, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	The "Titan Unity": Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration for Misdelivery of Cargo Claim 18 Dec 2013 Singapore Tankers (Defendant)Neutral	18 Dec 2013	Singapore Tankers (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for Singapore Tankers is not explicitly stated in this extract.
15	S E Shipping Lines v Austral Asia Line: Winding-Up Application Dispute 29 Oct 2012 Austral Asia Line Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2012	Austral Asia Line Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Sembcorp Marine v PPL Holdings: Joint Venture Dispute over Share Transfer and Contractual Obligations 29 May 2012 PPL Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	29 May 2012	PPL Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim Allowed in PartThe defendants' counterclaim was allowed in part.
17	ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty 16 Jan 2011 CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Jan 2011	CWT Commodities (SEA) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Sui Southern Gas v Habibullah Coastal Power: Gas Supply Agreement Dispute 22 Feb 2010 Sui Southern Gas Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Feb 2010	Sui Southern Gas Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, with costs to be paid to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment was delivered in Singapore.
19	Chua Chian Ya v Music & Movements: Breach of Contract & Restraint of Trade in Music Publishing Agreement 05 Nov 2009 Music & Movements (S) Pte Ltd (formerly trading as M & M Music Publishing) (Respondent)Lost	05 Nov 2009	Music & Movements (S) Pte Ltd (formerly trading as M & M Music Publishing) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
20	Muhlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity of Device for Inspecting Electronic Components 22 Feb 2009 Mühlbauer AG (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Feb 2009	Mühlbauer AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for patent infringement was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Obegi Melissa v Vestwin Trading: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Discarded Documents 27 Jan 2008 Nemesis Investigations Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	27 Jan 2008	Nemesis Investigations Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to be costs in the cause.
22	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim 20 Sep 2007 PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant)Won	20 Sep 2007	PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant): Claim DismissedBeckkett's claim against PT Dianlia Setyamukti was dismissed.
23	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed 28 Jan 2007 Lal Hiranand (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2007	Lal Hiranand (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, with costs here and below. The deposit for costs paid by the appellant is to be refunded to him. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Amendment of Reply, Sham Documents & Backdating Allegations 28 Dec 2006 PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant)Lost	28 Dec 2006	PT Dianlia Setyamukti (Defendant): Application GrantedThe court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend its reply to the second defendant's defence.
25	WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions 26 Dec 2006 Plaintiffs in the Estate of Ferdinand E Marcos Human Rights Litigation (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2006	Plaintiffs in the Estate of Ferdinand E Marcos Human Rights Litigation (Defendant): WonThe Republic's application to stay the claims of the 7th defendant was dismissed.
26	Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case 09 Oct 2006 Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	09 Oct 2006	Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Application AllowedApplication to adduce new evidence was allowed, and the case was remitted to the trial judge.
27	Vestwin Trading v Obegi Melissa: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Property 26 Jun 2006 Tang Boon Swa (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2006	Tang Boon Swa (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantPermanent injunction granted and inquiry as to damages ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute 05 Jun 2006 Lal Hiranand (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jun 2006	Lal Hiranand (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim that the 1999 deed be set aside or declared unenforceable was dismissed.
29	Petrosin Corp v Clough Engineering: Breach of Contract & Oral Agreement Dispute 19 Sep 2005 Petrosin Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Sep 2005	Petrosin Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay 75% of the defendant's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue on Bills of Lading under Bills of Lading Act 13 Sep 2005 UCO Bank (Appellant)Won	13 Sep 2005	UCO Bank (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, restoring the action for further hearing.
31	Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG: Interim Injunction on Share Sale in Indonesian Coalmine Dispute 26 May 2005 PT Dianlia Sety Amukti (Defendant)Won	26 May 2005	PT Dianlia Sety Amukti (Defendant): Application DeniedApplication for interim injunction restraining sale of shares was denied.
32	Wee Poh Hueh Florence v Performance Motors Ltd: Breach of Warranty of Quality and Damages Assessment 01 Mar 2004 Wee Poh Hueh Florence (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	01 Mar 2004	Wee Poh Hueh Florence (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAwarded $83,790 as general damages and $5,000 as damages for loss of use of the car. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd: Arbitration Agreement & Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute 09 Sep 2003 PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia (Applicant)Partial	09 Sep 2003	PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia (Applicant): Application dismissed in partApplication dismissed except for the order on costs, which was set aside.
34	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute 07 Aug 2003 Lal Hiranand (Defendant)Neutral	07 Aug 2003	Lal Hiranand (Defendant): No orders madeNo orders were made in respect of Summons-in-Chambers No 600208 of 2003 as the issues there have been rendered irrelevant by reason of the disposal of the plaintiff’s summons-in-chambers.
35	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Lender's Duty in Receivership 15 Jul 2003 Tan (Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2003	Tan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to bear the costs of the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	Roberto Building Material v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Stay of Appeal & Single Judge Powers 15 May 2003 Tan Heng How (Appellant)Won	15 May 2003	Tan Heng How (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, decision of single judge reviewed and varied.
37	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Air Waybill 09 Dec 2002 Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	09 Dec 2002	Beam Technology (Mfg) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and judgment in favor of the respondents, the confirming bank, set aside.
38	Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc: Breach of Contract & Failure of Consideration 10 Oct 2002 Ooi Ching Ling (Appellant)Lost	10 Oct 2002	Ooi Ching Ling (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs.
39	Ng Poh Guan v Chan Ai Leng: Breach of Contract & Unauthorised Renovation 25 Nov 2001 Ng Poh Guan (Plaintiff)Dismissed	25 Nov 2001	Ng Poh Guan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed.
40	Ng Poh Guan v Chan Ai Leng: Breach of Contract & Unauthorized Renovation 25 Nov 2001 Ng Poh Guan (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Nov 2001	Ng Poh Guan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims were dismissed.
41	Lam Soon v Whang: Amendment of Defence, Time Bar, and Laches in Trademark Dispute 16 Oct 2001 Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Partial	16 Oct 2001	Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application allowed in partApplication to amend defence allowed in part. Ordered to pay costs of application fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore); and costs occasioned by the amendment to be taxed.
42	Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application 16 Oct 2001 Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Neutral	16 Oct 2001	Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application to amend defence allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application to amend defence allowed in part and dismissed in part.
43	Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application 16 Oct 2001 Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2001	Forward Supreme Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application to amend Defence dismissed in partCosts of application fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore); costs occasioned by the amendment to be taxed.
44	Tom-Reck Security Services v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Immigrant Employment & Corporate Criminal Liability 18 Feb 2001 Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	18 Feb 2001	Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the fine of $120,000 was ordered to be refunded to Tom-Reck. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Law Society of Singapore v Singham: Solicitor's Sexual Relationship with Client & Professional Misconduct 01 Jan 2001 Singham Dennis Mahendran (Respondent)Lost	01 Jan 2001	Singham Dennis Mahendran (Respondent): Suspended from practiceThe respondent was suspended from practice as an advocate and solicitor for three years. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore: Complaint Against Advocates and Solicitors 03 Aug 2000 The Law Society of Singapore (Defendant)Won	03 Aug 2000	The Law Society of Singapore (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts fixed at $2,500.00 to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.