Lin Weiqi Wendy

Lin Weiqi Wendy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated expertise across 127 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	16 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	14 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Labuan Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collateral Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malaysian Trustee Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auditing Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tiered Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Permanent Court of Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misnomer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mergers and Acquisitions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time limit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Weiqi Wendy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Weiqi Wendy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 24 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	24 cases	100% of cases	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle(Nov 2024) DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute(Nov 2024) Palm Grove v Hilton: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Hotel Management Disputes(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Weiqi Wendy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 12 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	153.9 parties avg	3.9	63%
Partial	65.3 parties avg	5.3	25%
Won	33.5 parties avg	3.5	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	44.2 parties avg	4.2
2021	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	64.3 parties avg	4.3
2023	34.6 parties avg	4.6
2024	44.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Weiqi Wendy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	15(63%)	63%
Partial	6(25%)	25%
Won	3(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	735,080.00	52,505.7114 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle 25 Nov 2024 Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	25 Nov 2024	Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar (“AR”) in HC/SUM 2148/2024 (“SUM 2148”), where the AR granted leave to the 2nd and 3rd Defendants (“2D and “3D” respectively, collectively the “Defendants”) to amend their Defence, is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute 25 Nov 2024 DJY (Claimant)Lost	25 Nov 2024	DJY (Claimant): Application for injunction dismissedApplication for injunction against DJZ and the Bank dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Palm Grove v Hilton: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Hotel Management Disputes 09 May 2024 Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (Claimant)Lost	09 May 2024	Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (Claimant): Application dismissedPalm Grove's application to set aside the 2nd and 3rd Partial Awards was dismissed in its entirety.
4	Lao People's Democratic Republic v Lao Holdings NV: Setting Aside of ICSID Award Enforcement 17 Apr 2024 Lao Holdings NV (Respondent)Lost	17 Apr 2024	Lao Holdings NV (Respondent): Application dismissedLHNV’s application seeking to set aside the order giving GOL permission to enforce the ICSID Award, fails and is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Law Society of Singapore v Ravi s/o Madasamy: Clarification on Suspension Period under Legal Profession Act 25 Apr 2023 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Lost	25 Apr 2023	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the application for clarification, holding that Mr. Ravi's voluntary undertaking did not constitute a suspension under the Legal Profession Act.
6	Raffles Education v. Prakash: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract. Education Sector Dispute. 05 Apr 2023 Raffles Design International India Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2023	Raffles Design International India Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part.
7	Tritech v Duan Wei: Breach of Confidence, Misrepresentation, and Negligence Claims 21 Feb 2023 Tritech Engineering & Testing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Feb 2023	Tritech Engineering & Testing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part. Damages to be assessed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Conspiracy Claims 29 Nov 2022 Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Nov 2022	Sang Cheol Woo (Plaintiff): Seoul High Court Judgment enforceableJudgment for Plaintiff; Seoul High Court Judgment enforceable against the first defendant, Charles Choi Spackman. Korean Supreme Court Judgment and New York Judgment not enforceable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Sanum Investments v Government of Lao: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award 31 May 2022 Lao Holdings NV (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	31 May 2022	Lao Holdings NV (Plaintiff, Applicant): Applications DismissedApplications to set aside and resist enforcement of the arbitral award were dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	CSY v CSZ: Stay of Court Proceedings & Court's Discretion Under Arbitration Act 18 May 2022 CSZ (Respondent)Lost	18 May 2022	CSZ (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the High Court's decision to stay part of HC/S 237/2021 in favour of a domestic arbitration was overturned.
11	Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao PDR: Setting Aside ICSID & PCA Awards for Bribery & Corruption Allegations 12 Apr 2022 Lao Holdings NV (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Apr 2022	Lao Holdings NV (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedApplications to set aside the BIT Awards were dismissed, and Lao Holdings NV was ordered to pay costs of SGD 214,000 to the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (this amount is net of the costs awarded to Lao Holdings NV for the Sealing Applications). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	National Oilwell Varco Norway AS v Keppel FELS: Enforcing Arbitration Awards Despite Misnomer 15 Mar 2022 Keppel FELS Ltd (formerly known as Far East Levingston Shipbuilding Ltd) (Respondent)Lost	15 Mar 2022	Keppel FELS Ltd (formerly known as Far East Levingston Shipbuilding Ltd) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments Ltd: Setting Aside Judgment and Garnishee Orders After Appeal 13 Jan 2022 Sanum Investments Limited (Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2022	Sanum Investments Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Sanum to return garnished sums.
14	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards & Costs \| International Arbitration Act 20 Jun 2021 CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	20 Jun 2021	CBY (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partPhase II Partial Awards set aside in so far as they order payment of the Remaining Amounts. Costs Award set aside.
15	CBX v CBZ: Appeal on Costs in SICC Arbitration Setting Aside Proceedings 20 Jun 2021 CBX (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2021	CBX (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the Costs Judgment allowed; costs order made below set aside.
16	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression under Companies Act 04 May 2021 Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 May 2021	Ong Heng Chuan (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; OHC to pay costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	BRS v BRQ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice & Time Limit Extension 28 Oct 2020 BRS (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2020	BRS (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe Seller's setting-aside application was time-barred.
18	CBX v CBZ: Costs Dispute After Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Arbitration Awards 07 Oct 2020 CBX (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Oct 2020	CBX (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantsPlaintiffs are to pay the Defendants’ costs of S$150,000 (all-in). Simple interest at 5.33% per annum is to run on the amount of S$150,000 from the date of this judgment until payment by the Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy 15 Jul 2020 CBX (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CBX (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application to set aside parts of two Partial Awards and the whole of a Final Award was dismissed.
20	Law Society v. Latimer: Disciplinary Proceedings for Grossly Improper Conduct 20 Feb 2020 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	20 Feb 2020	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Law Society's application was allowed, and the respondent was suspended for two years.
21	Adinop Co Ltd v Rovithai Ltd: Breach of Confidence & Confidentiality Agreement in Distributor Termination 14 Nov 2019 Adinop Co, Ltd (Appellant)Partial	14 Nov 2019	Adinop Co, Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part against Rovithai. Damages to be assessed by the Registrar. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	BVU v BVX: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud and Public Policy Violation 12 Mar 2019 BVX (Defendant, Respondent)Won	12 Mar 2019	BVX (Defendant, Respondent): Application to set aside the Supplier’s subpoena allowedApplication to set aside the Supplier’s subpoena allowed.
23	Adinop Co Ltd v Rovithai Ltd: Breach of Confidentiality Agreement & Obligations 29 May 2018 Adinop Co, Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 May 2018	Adinop Co, Ltd (Plaintiff): Action DismissedPlaintiff's action for breach of confidence was dismissed. Costs of the proceedings to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet: Dispute over Hotel Ownership and Trust Obligations 15 Jul 2014 Ram Parshotam Mittal (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Jul 2014	Ram Parshotam Mittal (Plaintiff): Anti-suit injunction dismissed; limited stay of proceedings granted in part.The anti-suit injunction application was dismissed. The limited stay application was granted in part, with Suit 785 being stayed until 31 October 2014. Costs were ordered to be paid to the Defendants, fixed at $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.