Loh Jen Wei

Loh Jen Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and winding up. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated expertise across 84 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Similarity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alteration of Position	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Design	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henna Artistry Business	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Special Purpose Vehicle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commingling of bank accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation of foreign company	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ascertainment of goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pay when paid	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loh Jen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loh Jen Wei has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk and Davidson	7 cases	35% of cases	RBG Resources plc v Credit Lyonnais: Foreign Company Liquidation & Creditor's Debt Claim(Oct 2005) Woh Hup v Lian Teck: Pre-Action Discovery & Arbitration Clauses in Construction Disputes(May 2005) Lian Teck Construction v Woh Hup: Pre-Action Discovery & Arbitration Clause Scope(Nov 2004)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	25% of cases	Singapore Medical Council v Ling Chia Tien: Appeal Against Suspension for Medical Misconduct(Nov 2024) Fastfreight Pte Ltd v Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd: Injunction, Winding Up & Arbitration(Aug 2022) Vinmar v PTT: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Incorporation by Dealings, and Stay of Proceedings(Oct 2018)
Rodyk & Davidson	4 cases	20% of cases	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Winding Up Petition Based on Arbitration Award(Sep 2011) Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil(Nov 2008) Hanson v Tan: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident(Nov 2007)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	15% of cases	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore(Apr 2010) Azizah bte Chalan Hassan v Chan Poh Teong: Personal Injury Claim for Damages(Jan 2009) Singapore Tourism Board v Children's Media Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Corporate Veil Piercing(May 2008)
Dentons Rodyk & Davison LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	Man Diesel & Turbo SE v I.M. Skaugen: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Proceedings(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loh Jen Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 10 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Lost	83.8 parties avg	3.8	40%
Partial	25.5 parties avg	5.5	10%
Won	93.2 parties avg	3.2	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	55.3 parties avg	5.3
2005	23.8 parties avg	3.8
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loh Jen Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	8(40%)	40%
Partial	2(10%)	10%
Won	9(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	518,032.89	518,032.891 cases	1
EUR	1,079,954.30	539,977.152 cases	2
SGD	6,809,688.65	851,211.088 cases	8
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%)
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Medical Council v Ling Chia Tien: Appeal Against Suspension for Medical Misconduct 05 Nov 2024 Ling Chia Tien (Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2024	Ling Chia Tien (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Dr. Ling was awarded costs fixed at $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Fastfreight Pte Ltd v Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd: Injunction, Winding Up & Arbitration 30 Aug 2022 Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2022	Bulk Trident Shipping Ltd (Defendant): Injunction Granted AgainstInjunction granted against the defendant, restraining them from commencing winding-up proceedings until the conclusion of the London arbitration.
3	Vinmar v PTT: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Incorporation by Dealings, and Stay of Proceedings 21 Oct 2018 Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	21 Oct 2018	Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and a stay of Suit 99 ordered.
4	Man Diesel & Turbo SE v I.M. Skaugen: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Proceedings 27 May 2018 IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 May 2018	IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedDefendant's application to challenge enforcement of the DIA Final Award was dismissed.
5	IM Skaugen v MAN Diesel: Misrepresentation, Assignment, and Forum in Marine Engine Fuel Consumption Dispute 24 May 2018 IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 May 2018	IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, Singapore is the appropriate forum.
6	AKN Marine Supplies v PWM Supply: Admiralty Claim for Ship Management Fees 22 Jun 2016 The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “PWM Supply” ex “Crest Supply 1” (Defendant)Dismissed	22 Jun 2016	The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “PWM Supply” ex “Crest Supply 1” (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim for damages for conversion, trespass and/or breach of contract was dismissed.
7	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Winding Up Petition Based on Arbitration Award 15 Sep 2011 Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant)Won	15 Sep 2011	Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant): Winding up order grantedUltrapolis be wound up by the court; DSK’s costs in these proceedings to be agreed or taxed and to be paid to DSK out of the assets of Ultrapolis.
8	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore 08 Apr 2010 Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant)Won	08 Apr 2010	Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant): Leave granted to enforce the Corrected AwardLeave is granted to enforce the Corrected Award in Arbitration case file E-1001 passed on 16 April 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark at the Danish Institute of Arbitration in the same manner as a Judgment of the High Court of Singapore. Judgment in terms of the Corrected Award is entered as follows: (a) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to pay to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E. Hansen A/S) EUR 357,855.00 with interest 1.5% per month of:- i. EUR 7,892 from 25 March 2006 until payment; ii. EUR 100,000 from 14 April 2006 until payment; iii. EUR 863 from 3 May 2006 until payment; iv. EUR 249,100 from 30 June 2006 until payment; within 14 days from the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). (b) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 23,406 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hanswen A/S) as costs of the arbitration case within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). (c) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 12,000 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) as costs of Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009).
9	Azizah bte Chalan Hassan v Chan Poh Teong: Personal Injury Claim for Damages 19 Jan 2009 Chan Poh Teong (Defendant, Respondent)Won	19 Jan 2009	Chan Poh Teong (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended the appeal.
10	Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil 13 Nov 2008 Singapore Tourism Board (Respondent)Won	13 Nov 2008	Singapore Tourism Board (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellants are liable to refund $6,155,250 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Singapore Tourism Board v Children's Media Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Corporate Veil Piercing 26 May 2008 Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff)Won	26 May 2008	Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
12	Hanson v Tan: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident 27 Nov 2007 Eu Zai Feng Elliot (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Nov 2007	Eu Zai Feng Elliot (Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartDependency claim allowed in part; awarded A$518,032.89.
13	Lian Teck Construction v Woh Hup: Stay of Proceedings & Interim Payment in Arbitration Dispute 05 Jul 2006 NCC International Aktiebolag (Respondent, Defendant)Won	05 Jul 2006	NCC International Aktiebolag (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	RBG Resources plc v Credit Lyonnais: Foreign Company Liquidation & Creditor's Debt Claim 27 Oct 2005 Credit Lyonnais (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	27 Oct 2005	Credit Lyonnais (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to admit proof of debt against the Singapore liquidation estate of RBG was dismissed.
15	Woh Hup v Lian Teck: Pre-Action Discovery & Arbitration Clauses in Construction Disputes 09 May 2005 NCC International Aktiebolag (Appellant)Lost	09 May 2005	NCC International Aktiebolag (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lian Teck Construction v Woh Hup: Pre-Action Discovery & Arbitration Clause Scope 16 Nov 2004 NCC International Aktiebolag (Defendant)Lost	16 Nov 2004	NCC International Aktiebolag (Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe defendants' appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel 28 Oct 2004 Credit Lyonnais (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	28 Oct 2004	Credit Lyonnais (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission of Mr. Henry Bernard Eder QC was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	RBG Resources v Banque Cantonale: Costs & Interest on Conversion Claim 05 Aug 2004 Credit Lyonnais (Defendant)Lost	05 Aug 2004	Credit Lyonnais (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed, save for one drum of nickel. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
19	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Sale of Goods, Metal Transactions & Liquidator's Rights 10 Jun 2004 Credit Lyonnais (Defendant)Partial	10 Jun 2004	Credit Lyonnais (Defendant): Claim Dismissed in PartCL's counterclaim is dismissed save for the said drum of nickel for which I declare CL to be the legal and beneficial owner. The sale proceeds of that drum of nickel are to be released to CL or its solicitors, as CL’s solicitors may direct, subject to any set-off in view of (c) above. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Schindler Lifts v Paya Ubi: Novation, 'Pay When Paid' Clauses & Defective Work in Construction Sub-Contracts 23 Feb 2004 Schindler Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Feb 2004	Schindler Lifts (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim against Paya Ubi Industrial Park dismissedSchindler Lifts' claim against Paya Ubi for implied novation was dismissed.