Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression Claim

In Koh Keng Chew and others v Liew Kit Fah and others, the Singapore High Court addressed the issue of the reference date for the valuation of shares in an oppression action under s 216 of the Companies Act. The plaintiffs, Koh Keng Chew, Koh Oon Bin, and Koh Hoon Lye, sought a buyout order against the defendants, Liew Kit Fah, Liew Chiew Woon, Pang Kok Lian, Soh Kim Seng, Soh Soon Jooh, Poh Teck Chuan, Samwoh Corporation Pte Ltd, Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd, Samwoh Infrastructure Pte Ltd, Samgreen Pte Ltd, Samwoh Marine Pte Ltd, Samwoh Shipping Pte Ltd, Resource Development Holdings Pte Ltd, Highway International Pte Ltd, Sam Land Pte Ltd and Sam Development Pte Ltd. The court determined that 17 February 2016 was the appropriate reference date for the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares in the defendant companies.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Reference date for share valuation set as 17 February 2016.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court judgment on reference date for share valuation in a minority shareholder oppression claim. The court decided on February 17, 2016, as the reference date.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Koh Keng ChewPlaintiffIndividualShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialLim Wei Lee, Catherine Chan
Koh Oon BinPlaintiffIndividualShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialLim Wei Lee, Catherine Chan
Koh Hoon LyePlaintiffIndividualShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialLim Wei Lee, Catherine Chan
Liew Kit FahDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Liew Chiew WoonDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Pang Kok LianDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Soh Kim SengDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Soh Soon JoohDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Poh Teck ChuanDefendantIndividualRequired to purchase plaintiffs' sharesPartialPatrick Ang, Chong Kah Kheng, Daniel Gaw
Samwoh Corporation Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Samwoh Resources Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Samwoh Infrastructure Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Samgreen Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Samwoh Marine Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Samwoh Shipping Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Resource Development Holdings Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Highway International Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Sam Land Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo
Sam Development Pte LtdDefendantCorporationShares to be purchased by the 1st to 6th defendantsPartialNicholas Ngo

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chua Lee MingJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lim Wei LeeWongPartnership LLP
Catherine ChanWongPartnership LLP
Patrick AngRajah & Tan Singapore LLP
Chong Kah KhengRajah & Tan Singapore LLP
Daniel GawRajah & Tan Singapore LLP
Nicholas NgoTSMP Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs commenced an action under s 216 of the Companies Act.
  2. The court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the plaintiffs’ shares.
  3. The parties agreed that an independent valuer would determine the price.
  4. The parties disagreed on the reference date for the valuation.
  5. The 1st to 6th defendants appealed against the decision regarding the reference date.
  6. The plaintiffs had not contributed to the Samwoh Group and had competed with it.
  7. The plaintiffs proposed 31 December 2014 as the reference date in an open offer.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Koh Keng Chew and others v Liew Kit Fah and others, Suit No 125 of 2014, [2017] SGHC 52
  2. Koh Keng Chew and others v Liew Kit Fah and others, , [2016] 4 SLR 1208

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Suit No 125 of 2014 filed
Writ in this action was filed
Initial offer made by the 1st to 6th defendants
Plaintiffs made an open offer to purchase the 1st to 6th defendants’ shares
Parties allegedly agreed to 31 December 2014 as reference date
1st to 6th defendants’ solicitors replied to plaintiffs
1st to 6th defendants issued a further open offer to the plaintiffs
Court order dated for buyout order
Judgment delivered for the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs
Hearing on the reference date for the valuation of the shares
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Reference Date for Share Valuation
    • Outcome: The court decided on 17 February 2016 as the reference date for the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2016] 4 SLR 1208
      • [1986] BCLC 430
      • [1986] Ch 211
      • [2002] 1 WLR 1024
      • [2006] 4 SLR(R) 745
      • [2010] 2 SLR 209
      • [2010] 2 SLR 776
      • [2010] 1 SLR 241
      • [2014] SGHC 224
      • [2016] SGHC 177
      • [1994] 2 SLR(R) 501
      • [2014] 4 SLR 140

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order for the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs

9. Cause of Actions

  • Oppression of Minority Shareholders

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Shareholder Disputes

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Koh Keng Chew and others v Liew Kit Fah and othersHigh CourtYes[2016] 4 SLR 1208SingaporeRefers to the earlier judgment where the court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs.
In re Cumana LtdN/AYes[1986] BCLC 430EnglandCited for the principle that the filing date reflects when the applicant treats unfair conduct as destroying the basis for continuing as a shareholder.
Re London School of Electronics LtdN/AYes[1986] Ch 211EnglandCited for the general proposition that an interest in a going concern should be valued at the date on which it is ordered to be purchased.
Profinance Trust SA v GladstoneEnglish Court of AppealYes[2002] 1 WLR 1024EnglandReviewed English decisions on share valuation and agreed with the proposition in Re London School of Electronics Ltd.
Lim Swee Khiang v BordenN/AYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 745SingaporeCited as a case where the Filing Date was chosen as the reference date.
Lim Chee Twang v Chan Shuk Kuen Helina and othersN/AYes[2010] 2 SLR 209SingaporeCited as a case where the Filing Date was chosen as the reference date.
Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests Holdings Ltd and anotherN/AYes[2010] 2 SLR 776SingaporeCited as a case where the Buyout Order Date was chosen.
Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck and othersN/AYes[2010] 1 SLR 241SingaporeCited as a case where the Buyout Order Date was chosen.
Sharikat Logistics Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Chuan and othersHigh CourtYes[2014] SGHC 224SingaporeCited as a case where the Buyout Order Date was chosen.
Lim Seng Wah and another v Han Meng Siew and othersHigh CourtYes[2016] SGHC 177SingaporeCited as a case where the Buyout Order Date was chosen.
Tullio Planeta v Maoro Andrea GN/AYes[1994] 2 SLR(R) 501SingaporeDiscussed the general rule in Re London School of Electronics Ltd but did not express a clear view on it.
Lim Ah Sia v Tiong Tuang Yeong and othersN/AYes[2014] 4 SLR 140SingaporeDiscusses an agreement reached before it was voided, and the court decided that going back to the agreement was the fairest way of valuing the plaintiff’s shares.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 216Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Reference date
  • Share valuation
  • Buyout order
  • Minority shareholders
  • Oppression action
  • Independent valuer
  • Filing Date
  • Buyout Order Date

15.2 Keywords

  • share valuation
  • minority shareholder
  • oppression
  • companies act
  • singapore
  • high court

16. Subjects

  • Company Law
  • Share Valuation
  • Minority Shareholder Rights

17. Areas of Law

  • Company Law
  • Oppression of Minority Shareholders
  • Valuation of Shares