Peter Keith Fernando

Peter Keith Fernando is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 29 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 21.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated expertise across 64 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	27 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	25 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 25 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	16 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	11 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice11% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Treatment Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alteration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit Card Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Morbid Jealousy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Self-Defense	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery with hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Internet Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Keith Fernando has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Keith Fernando has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Leo Fernando	19 cases	66% of cases	PP v Dzulkarnain: Trafficking in Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2021) PP v Dinesh: Interpreting s 228(4) CPC on Guilty Pleas & Mitigation(Apr 2019) GCX v Public Prosecutor: MTO Suitability Report & Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt(Jan 2019)
Leo Fernando LLC	8 cases	28% of cases	Poh Yuan Nie v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Dishonest Concealment, Penal Code s 415(Nov 2022) Public Prosecutor v Ramendra Krishnan: Trafficking and Possession of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2021) Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code Offences(Aug 2021)
M/s Leo Fernando	2 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Moad Fadzir: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention(Feb 2019) Jayasekara v Public Prosecutor: Robbery Conviction Appeal Based on Insufficient Evidence(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Keith Fernando's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	212.4 parties avg	2.4	72%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	7%
Won	62.3 parties avg	2.3	21%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2020	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Keith Fernando's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	21(72%)	72%
Partial	2(7%)	7%
Won	6(21%)	21%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	76.00	38.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2019	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2020	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 29 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Poh Yuan Nie v Public Prosecutor: Cheating, Dishonest Concealment, Penal Code s 415 20 Nov 2022 Poh Yuan Nie (Applicant)Lost	20 Nov 2022	Poh Yuan Nie (Applicant): Applications dismissedApplication for leave to refer questions of law of public interest to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Ramendra Krishnan: Trafficking and Possession of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2021 Ramendra Krishnan (Defendant)Lost	24 Oct 2021	Ramendra Krishnan (Defendant): GuiltyRamendra Krishnan was found guilty on all three charges related to drug trafficking and possession.
3	Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code Offences 24 Aug 2021 Arumaikannu Sasikumar (Appellant)Lost	24 Aug 2021	Arumaikannu Sasikumar (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Charge 6 amended. Sentences remain the same. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PP v Dzulkarnain: Trafficking in Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Feb 2021 Sanjay Krishnan (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Sanjay Krishnan (Defendant): ConvictedSanjay was convicted of possession of cannabis for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death sentence.
5	PP v Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway: Trafficking, Possession of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Oct 2020 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Defendant)Lost	29 Oct 2020	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway (Defendant): GuiltyRoshdi was found guilty of possession of a controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
6	Public Prosecutor v Punithan: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act and Penal Code 14 May 2020 Punithan a/l Genasan (Defendant)Lost	14 May 2020	Punithan a/l Genasan (Defendant): LostThe accused was convicted of the charge.
7	BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child 22 Mar 2020 BRJ (Appellant)Lost	22 Mar 2020	BRJ (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of imprisonment was dismissed.
8	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMoad Fadzir's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
9	PP v Dinesh: Interpreting s 228(4) CPC on Guilty Pleas & Mitigation 22 Apr 2019 Dinesh S/O Rajantheran (Respondent)Won	22 Apr 2019	Dinesh S/O Rajantheran (Respondent): Conviction Set AsideThe respondent's conviction was set aside and the matter remitted to the State Courts for trial.
10	Roger Yue Jr v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Rape and Sexual Penetration of a Minor 21 Feb 2019 Roger Yue Jr (Appellant)Lost	21 Feb 2019	Roger Yue Jr (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
11	Public Prosecutor v Moad Fadzir: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Common Intention 14 Feb 2019 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Defendant)Lost	14 Feb 2019	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Defendant): Guilty as chargedMoad Fadzir was found guilty as charged and sentenced to death.
12	GCX v Public Prosecutor: MTO Suitability Report & Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 23 Jan 2019 GCX (Appellant)Won	23 Jan 2019	GCX (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; imprisonment sentence substituted with a Mandatory Treatment Order for 24 months.
13	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2018 ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2018	ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedZainal's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
14	Public Prosecutor v Roger Yue Jr: Statutory Rape and Sexual Penetration of a Minor 20 May 2018 Roger Yue Jr (Defendant)Lost	20 May 2018	Roger Yue Jr (Defendant): LostAccused convicted of all seven charges and sentenced to a total of 25 years’ imprisonment.
15	Public Prosecutor v Ong Soon Heng: Rape and Abduction Case 15 Mar 2018 Ong Soon Heng (Defendant)Lost	15 Mar 2018	Ong Soon Heng (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of rape and abduction and ordered to pay compensation of $76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	PP v Rahmat & Zainal: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act at IKEA 01 Jan 2018 ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Defendant)Lost	01 Jan 2018	ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of trafficking in a Class A controlled drug and sentenced to death.
17	Public Prosecutor v Chia Kee Chen: Murder Trial for Dexmon Chua's Death 16 Jan 2017 Chia Kee Chen (Defense)Lost	16 Jan 2017	Chia Kee Chen (Defense): Guilty as chargedThe defendant was convicted of murder.
18	PP v Masoud Rahimi & Mogan Raj: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Nov 2015 Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad (Defendant)Lost	03 Nov 2015	Masoud Rahimi bin Mehrzad (Defendant): Death sentenceMasoud Rahimi was found guilty and sentenced to death on the capital charge.
19	Public Prosecutor v. Victorine Noella Wijeysingha: Corruption Charges & Inducement for Leniency 18 Mar 2013 Victorine Noella Wijeysingha (Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2013	Victorine Noella Wijeysingha (Respondent): Acquittal UpheldThe respondent's acquittal on corruption charges was upheld.
20	Jayasekara v Public Prosecutor: Robbery Conviction Appeal Based on Insufficient Evidence 10 Mar 2011 Jullian Hettige Hasitha Migara Perera (Appellant)Won	10 Mar 2011	Jullian Hettige Hasitha Migara Perera (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction and sentence allowed.
21	Ng Chee Tiong Tony v PP: Trial Judge's Inquisitorial Role & Unfair Trial 11 Dec 2007 Ng Chee Tiong Tony (Appellant)Won	11 Dec 2007	Ng Chee Tiong Tony (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; conviction set aside and Ng acquitted.
22	PP v Fernando Payagala: Credit Card Fraud & Sentencing Principles 14 Feb 2007 Fernando Payagala Waduge Malitha Kumar (Respondent)Lost	14 Feb 2007	Fernando Payagala Waduge Malitha Kumar (Respondent): Sentences EnhancedThe respondent's sentences for criminal misappropriation and cheating were enhanced.
23	G Krishnasamy Naidu v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Abnormality of Mind in Murder Case 20 Sep 2006 G Krishnasamy Naidu (Appellant)Partial	20 Sep 2006	G Krishnasamy Naidu (Appellant): Conviction of murder set aside; convicted of culpable homicideThe appeal was allowed in part. The conviction of murder was set aside, and the appellant was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
24	Vijayakumar v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Exception & Self-Defense 13 Mar 2006 Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Appellant)Lost	13 Mar 2006	Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed.
25	Ismail v PP: Arms Offences Act - Use of Firearm with Intent to Injure 02 Mar 2004 Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant)Lost	02 Mar 2004	Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
26	Rupchand Bhojwani Sunil v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & Internet Misuse in E-Commerce 02 Feb 2004 Rupchand Bhojwani Sunil (Appellant)Partial	02 Feb 2004	Rupchand Bhojwani Sunil (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against sentence allowed. Sentence reduced to six months.
27	Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury 18 Nov 2003 Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Lost	18 Nov 2003	Ismail bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was found guilty and convicted as charged.
28	Sahadevan v PP: Robbery with Hurt - Prosecution's Burden of Proof 20 Oct 2002 Sahadevan s/o Gundan (Appellant)Won	20 Oct 2002	Sahadevan s/o Gundan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction and sentence allowed; conviction and sentence set aside.
29	Sharom bin Ahmad v PP: Drug Trafficking, Possession, and Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Jul 2000 Boksenang bin Bochek (Appellant)Lost	16 Jul 2000	Boksenang bin Bochek (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.