Tay Bing Wei

Tay Bing Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Claims by sub-contractor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutes and regulations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electrical Engineering	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Licensed Electrical Worker Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hotel Operations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Bing Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Bing Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	AES Façade Pte Ltd v Wyse Private Limited: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call Dispute(Jul 2018) SH Design & Build Pte Ltd v BD Cranetech Pte Ltd: SOP Act Adjudication & Performance Bond(May 2018) AES Façade Pte Ltd v WYSE Pte Ltd: Security of Payment Act & Sub-Contractor Claims(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Bing Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.2 parties avg	2.2	71%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Bing Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,072,340.48	214,468.105 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AES Façade Pte Ltd v Wyse Private Limited: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call Dispute 19 Jul 2018 AES Façade Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jul 2018	AES Façade Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the call on the performance bond was dismissed.
2	SH Design & Build Pte Ltd v BD Cranetech Pte Ltd: SOP Act Adjudication & Performance Bond 30 May 2018 SH Design & Build Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 May 2018	SH Design & Build Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	AES Façade Pte Ltd v WYSE Pte Ltd: Security of Payment Act & Sub-Contractor Claims 17 Jul 2017 AES Façade Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jul 2017	AES Façade Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication to enforce the adjudication decision was granted and the sum of $1,072,340.48 was to be released forthwith to AES (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	UES Holdings v KH Foges: Adjudication Determination, Apparent Bias & Security of Payment Act 28 May 2017 UES Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 May 2017	UES Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.
5	Grouteam Pte Ltd v UES Holdings Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Law, Security of Payment Act, Adjudication Determination 25 Oct 2016 UES Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	25 Oct 2016	UES Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the appellant. The court is minded to fix these costs, and the parties are to submit written submissions setting out their arguments as to the appropriate quantum of these costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Libra Building v Emergent Engineering: Security of Payment Act & Multiple Payment Claims 26 Oct 2015 Libra Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Oct 2015	Libra Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application allowedApplication allowed; the adjudication determination was set aside with costs to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability 01 Jun 2014 J M Pang & Seah (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	01 Jun 2014	J M Pang & Seah (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partDefendant to bear 70% of the loss. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.