Albert Hong Hin Kay

Albert Hong Hin Kay is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Albert Hong Hin Kay has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Harish Kumar Jonathan Toh
Global Law Alliance LLC	3 cases	Liew Teck Huat Niru Pillai Jason Yeo
Troy Yeo & Co	2 cases	Troy Yeo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Albert Hong Hin Kay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 4 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Albert Hong Hin Kay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	46,746.51	46,746.511 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-188 08 Sep 2016	08 Sep 2016	Defendant	LostLiable for damages awarded for Kusnandar's fees in the amount of $46,746.51 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
2	2015-sgca-3 21 Jan 2015	21 Jan 2015	Respondent, Appellant	PartialAppeal in CA 68 dismissed; appeal in CA 69 allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2014-sghc-83 21 Apr 2014	21 Apr 2014	Defendant	DismissedThe Hongs’ prayers for relief in their counterclaim in Suit 964 were dismissed.
4	2014-sghc-65 09 Apr 2014	09 Apr 2014	Defendant	LostJudgment for damages to be assessed for the reasonable costs of taking measures to remove the MEC Charge from the land title certificate. The assessment of such costs is to be conducted by me or another judge (including a judicial commissioner) of the High Court. The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any claim by DVI in relation to the transfer of the DVI Shares, including reasonable costs of defending any claim that DVI may bring against Columbia and/or PTNM. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of IDR 7,027,522,992 being the additional taxes that were paid to the ITA in respect of the years 2004 to 2007; and The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any future tax assessments on PTNM for the period before 22 January 2008, as well as any penalties which may be imposed and/or any reasonable costs (including legal costs) which may be incurred in dealing with any investigation and/or prosecution by the tax authorities. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of S$262,934.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.