Anthony Wee Soon Kim

Anthony Wee Soon Kim is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Anthony Wee Soon Kim has been represented by 3 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Goh Aik Leng & Partners	2 cases	Mark Goh Aik Leng
Chor Pee and Partners	1 case	Lim Chor Pee
Independent Practitioner	1 case	Anthony Wee Soon Kim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anthony Wee Soon Kim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 4 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.8 parties avg	3.8	83.3%
	16.0 parties avg	6.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	34.7 parties avg	4.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anthony Wee Soon Kim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83.3%)	83.3%
	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 21	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sghc-219 26 Nov 2006	26 Nov 2006	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed; Mr. Wee shall pay the Law Society’s costs in connection with this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2004-sghc-187 26 Aug 2004	26 Aug 2004	Plaintiff	LostApplication to set aside order dismissed; Mr. Wee to bear the costs of the appeal personally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2003-sghc-55 12 Mar 2003	12 Mar 2003	Applicant, Plaintiff	LostApplication to admit Richard de Lacy QC was dismissed; Anthony Wee was ordered to pay UBS AG costs of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2002-sghc-260 01 Nov 2002	01 Nov 2002	Plaintiff, Applicant	LostOriginating Motion dismissed with costs of $5,000 to be paid to the bank (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2002-sghc-206 06 Sep 2002	06 Sep 2002	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostPlaintiff's appeal against the order granting the defendant's application for orders under section 175 of the Evidence Act was dismissed.
6	2002-sghc-22 06 Feb 2002	06 Feb 2002	Defendant	Unknown