ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd

ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.8
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Dismissed13.0 parties avg
Lost32.7 parties avg
Won13.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202313.0 parties avg
201812.0 parties avg
201613.0 parties avg
201513.0 parties avg
201413.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Dismissed1(20.0%)
Lost3(60.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD42,500.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20231
1
20181
1
20161
1
20151
1
20141
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
13 Apr 2023
DefendantLostFound liable for damages to Towa Corporation for patent infringement. The currency is JPY, as it is the functional currency of Towa Corporation.
04 Jan 2018
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed with costs of $85,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21 Dec 2016
DefendantLostThe court found ASM Technology Singapore Pte Ltd liable for infringing Towa Corporation's patent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
01 Feb 2015
DefendantDismissedDefendant's application for specific discovery was dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
07 Aug 2014
DefendantWonPlaintiff's application for inspection of the IDEALmold machine was dismissed.