Asplenium Land Pte Ltd

Asplenium Land Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 40.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Asplenium Land Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	Chuah Chee Kian Christopher Christopher Chuah Kua Lay Theng Rachael Chong Rae-Hua Chain Xiao Wei Edmund Candy Agnes Sutedja Liana Chek Daniel Ow Lydia Bte Yahaya Amanda Lim Qian Wen

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Asplenium Land Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 2 (40.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	54.4 parties avg	4.4	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Asplenium Land Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sghc-133 28 Jun 2020	28 Jun 2020	Defendant	WonPlaintiff's claims in conspiracy against the first defendant are struck out in their totality.
2	2020-sghc-81 26 Apr 2020	26 Apr 2020	Defendant	WonThe court dismissed CKR's application for leave to appeal, upholding the arbitral award in favor of Asplenium.
3	2019-sghc-41 21 Feb 2019	21 Feb 2019	Applicant	WonApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2016-sghc-85 11 May 2016	11 May 2016	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared Payment Claim No. 22 invalid and ordered the Defendant to withdraw Adjudication Application No. SOP/AA 423 of 2015 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2015-sgca-24 21 Apr 2015	21 Apr 2015	Respondent, Appellant	WonAsplenium's appeal against the Judge’s decision was allowed.