C S Partners Pte Ltd

C S Partners Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

C S Partners Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	Jill Ann Koh Koh Swee Yen Ho Wei Jie Keith Han Jill Ann Koh Ying Alvin Yeo Jared Chen Goh Mu Quan Lim Yangyu

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of C S Partners Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 4 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	75.0%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of C S Partners Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Partial	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000,000.00	1,000,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sghc-131 27 Sep 2018	27 Sep 2018	Defendant	LostClaim partially dismissed; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2018-sghc-130 27 Sep 2018	27 Sep 2018	Defendant	LostThe court held that both cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel operate to prevent the defendants from arguing that there was an overarching agreement for the plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2016-sgca-45 12 Jul 2016	12 Jul 2016	Appellant, Respondent	PartialThe Engs are entitled to compensation for work done with regard to Project Plaza (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2015-sghc-173 09 Jul 2015	09 Jul 2015	Defendant	LostCounterclaim dismissed except for agreed management fees.