CHIK SAU KAM
CHIK SAU KAM is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
CHIK SAU KAM has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
LVM Law Chambers LLC | 2 cases |
Eldan Law LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of CHIK SAU KAM's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.0
- Complex Cases
- 3 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 17.0 parties avg |
Partial | 17.0 parties avg |
Won | 17.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2018 | 17.0 parties avg |
2017 | 17.0 parties avg |
2016 | 17.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of CHIK SAU KAM's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 1(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 180,666.673 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2018 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 1 |
2016 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
16 Jan 2018 | Appellant, Respondent, Defendant | PartialAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Apr 2017 | Defendant | LostLiable for 90% of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting to $540,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
30 Mar 2016 | Defendant | WonCosts fixed at $2000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |