Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd

Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 16 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 45.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 27.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 16 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	1 case	Chu Hua Yi Philip Ling Daw Hoang Ling Daw Hoang Philip Philip Ling Molly Lim Hwa Hoong Luan Ling Daw Hoong Philip Hwa Hoon Luan
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Debby Lim Lim Hui Li Debby Melvin Chan Melvin Chan Kah Keen Jonathan Yang
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Randolph Khoo Johnson Loo Chew Ching Li

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (27.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	36.4%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	18.2%
Won	52.2 parties avg	2.2	45.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2008	42.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(36.4%)	36.4%
Partial	2(18.2%)	18.2%
Won	5(45.5%)	45.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	779,050.00	155,810.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2009	3 112	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2008	2 13	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 3 cases (150.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2010-sghc-170 07 Jun 2010	07 Jun 2010	Defendant, Plaintiff	LostClaim dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2010-sghc-83 16 Mar 2010	16 Mar 2010	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; claim for moneys had and received in respect of the Two Cheques was time-barred. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2010-sghc-44 04 Feb 2010	04 Feb 2010	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's action dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2009-sghc-269 25 Nov 2009	25 Nov 2009	Claimant, Applicant	WonThe Respondent's application to set aside the Unsigned Adjudication Determination was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2009-sghc-237 21 Oct 2009	21 Oct 2009	Claimant, Appellant	WonThe appeal by the respondent was dismissed.
6	2009-sgca-27 25 Jun 2009	25 Jun 2009	Respondent, Plaintiff	PartialThe company's claim for overpayment of salary was dismissed, but the court upheld the company's right to summarily dismiss the appellant.
7	2009-sghc-2 05 Jan 2009	05 Jan 2009	Defendant, Plaintiff	LostApplication to add director as defendant was allowed.
8	2008-sghc-227 01 Dec 2008	01 Dec 2008	Plaintiff	WonThe plaintiff's application to amend its Reply and Defence to Counterclaim was granted, allowing them to include a specific incident of the defendant's alleged wrongful disposal of equipment.
9	2008-sghc-159 23 Sep 2008	23 Sep 2008	Applicant	WonApplication to dismiss the Adjudication Determination was dismissed.
10	2008-sghc-151 14 Sep 2008	14 Sep 2008	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd in the sum of $5,320 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	2008-sghc-12 24 Jan 2008	24 Jan 2008	Defendant, Respondent	PartialAppeal partially allowed; summary judgment granted for $347,030 against Lim and $426,700 against Lim and Tan (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).