CKG
CKG is a other in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
CKG has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
Cavenagh Law LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of CKG's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 22.0 parties avg |
2021 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of CKG's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 40,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 2 |
2021 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2022 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal allowed with costs of $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Apr 2022 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal upheld; CKG awarded $50,000 for the costs of the appeal, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
17 Jun 2021 | Plaintiff, Respondent | PartialThe court found that the Tribunal failed to take into account an issue which was before it, namely the existence and quantum of the Principal Debt and accruing interest, which was common ground between the parties, and which it accepted at the time of the hearing should be taken into account. |