Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah
Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 7.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 10 complex cases, representing 71.4% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah has been represented by 4 law firms and 4 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Hoh Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Trident Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Carson Law Chambers | 2 cases |
| K K Cheng Law LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 11.9
- Complex Cases
- 10 (71.4%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1014.1 parties avg |
| Neutral | 28.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
| 18.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 514.0 parties avg |
| 2023 | 221.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 311.0 parties avg |
| 2021 | 28.0 parties avg |
| 2020 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 10(71.4%) |
| Neutral | 2(14.3%) |
| Won | 1(7.1%) |
| 1(7.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 221 |
| 2023 | 1 2 |
| 2022 | 2 21 |
| 2021 | 1 2 |
| 2020 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 14 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
07 Nov 2024 | Other | NeutralThe real parties in interest are the Claimants, and ordinarily, they should bear the costs. However, in the present circumstances, the court makes no order as to costs. |
26 Sep 2024 | Applicant | LostApplication for review of conviction dismissed. |
24 Sep 2024 | Other | Unknown |
26 Mar 2024 | Appellant, Applicant | LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. |
29 Jan 2024 | Other | NeutralOutcome for Datchinamurthy is neutral in this application for ad hoc admission. |
04 Dec 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
24 May 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication for reinstatement of appeal and extension of time to file documents was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2022 | Claimant | LostApplication for a declaration that the Presumptions contained in Section 18(1) and 18(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 which were imposed upon the Claimants should be read down and given effect as imposing an evidential burden only in Compliance with Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Constitution and the Common law Presumption of innocence was dismissed. |
03 Aug 2022 | Appellant, Claimant | LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed. |
29 May 2022 | Respondent, Applicant | WonThe stay of execution granted by the High Court was upheld, pending the resolution of his judicial review application. |
29 Nov 2021 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff. |
04 Apr 2021 | Applicant | LostApplication for leave to review the earlier decision was dismissed. |
12 Feb 2020 | Plaintiff | LostApplication for judicial review dismissed. |
07 May 2015 | Defendant | LostDatchinamurthy was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death, as he was not certified to have provided substantial assistance and was found to be more than a mere courier. |