Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation)
Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) has been represented by 3 law firms and 11 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Premier Law LLC | 2 cases |
Legis Point LLC | 1 case |
Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.5
- Complex Cases
- 1 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 23.5 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 13.0 parties avg |
2014 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 2(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
HKD | 16,127,325.941 cases |
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 1 1 |
2014 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
08 Sep 2016 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding post-judgment interest calculations. The base value of the shares before interest is HKD16,127,325.94. Post-judgment pre-liquidation interest should run for six years (ie, from 2001-04-06 to 2007-04-05) instead of four years, with the applicable rate to be 5% per annum. Post-judgment post-liquidation interest should be awarded at the HK post-judgment rate of 8% per annum from 2009-12-22, the date on which liquidators were appointed. |
28 Apr 2014 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialCivil Appeal No 105 of 2013 allowed. Damages available to Dynasty to the extent that we have found these are claimable against Sia and Lee for their breaches of fiduciary duty will be assessed by a High Court judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |