Koh Kia Jeng

Koh Kia Jeng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 19.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 28% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated expertise across 115 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	21 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lump sum contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Functions of judge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offshore Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wealth Protection	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Workover Pulling Unit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charter Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oil and Gas Industry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Subcontract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Dealership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement on roll of advocates and solicitors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Kia Jeng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Kia Jeng has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	12 cases	48% of cases	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute(May 2016) Dynasty Line v. Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Liability in Share Pledge(Apr 2014) KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses(Feb 2014)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	9 cases	36% of cases	JE Synergy Engineering v Sinohydro: SOPA Adjudication Dispute Involving Alleged Fraud and Corruption(Dec 2023) JE Synergy Engineering v Niu Ji Wei: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration(Oct 2023) Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case(Aug 2023)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	4% of cases	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction(Nov 2023)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	4% of cases	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction(Sep 2006)
Lee and Lee	1 cases	4% of cases	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Sale of Goods, Metal Transactions & Liquidator's Rights(Jun 2004)
Rodyk and Davidson	1 cases	4% of cases	Gnaguru s/o Thamboo Mylvaganam v Law Society: Application for Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Kia Jeng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 7 (28%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.8 parties avg	2.8	40%
Neutral	33.0 parties avg	3.0	12%
Partial	73.9 parties avg	3.9	28%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Won	54.2 parties avg	4.2	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	52.6 parties avg	2.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Kia Jeng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(38%)	38%
Neutral	3(12%)	12%
Partial	7(27%)	27%
Stayed	1(4%)	4%
Won	5(19%)	19%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,918,998.33	345,949.9220 cases	20

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Stayed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JE Synergy Engineering v Sinohydro: SOPA Adjudication Dispute Involving Alleged Fraud and Corruption 28 Dec 2023 Sinohydro Corp Ltd (Singapore Branch) (Defendant)Won	28 Dec 2023	Sinohydro Corp Ltd (Singapore Branch) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully resisted the claimant's application to set aside the adjudication determinations and stay their enforcement. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction 27 Nov 2023 UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Nov 2023	UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; UniCredit to pay costs of $100,000 to Glencore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	JE Synergy Engineering v Niu Ji Wei: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 04 Oct 2023 Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Third Party, Respondent)Won	04 Oct 2023	Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Third Party, Respondent): Stay GrantedStay of proceedings granted in favor of Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Costs Dispute in Construction Delay Case 02 Aug 2023 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	02 Aug 2023	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Unsuccessful party liable for costsJurong Primewide is the unsuccessful party and is liable for costs for both the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial. Total amount of costs and disbursements that JPW has to pay Crescendas for the first tranche and the second tranche of the trial as well as the interlocutory matters is $1,314,502.88 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Building & Construction Delay, Loss of Chance, Damages 08 Feb 2023 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	08 Feb 2023	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part, found liable for $4,185,802.60 in net rental revenue loss and $1,061,285.86 in Holding Costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Abuthahir v Bangkok Bank: Priority Rights to Bankrupt's Property Surplus Proceeds 30 Oct 2022 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Non-party)Neutral	30 Oct 2022	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Non-party): NeutralOCBC participated in the proceedings as a non-party and a funding creditor.
7	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation 20 Oct 2022 UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2022	UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims against the defendant were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Damages for Delay in Biopolis 3 Construction 09 Aug 2021 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	09 Aug 2021	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): PartialThe defendant admits liability for a sum of $132,157.12 for the site staff expenses for its 161 days of delay (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Crescendas Bionics v Jurong Primewide: Construction Contract Dispute over Preliminaries, Performance Bond, Shared Savings & Project Delays 10 Jan 2019 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Partial	10 Jan 2019	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Partial JudgmentCounterclaim for share of shared savings allowed; liable for general damages for 133 days of delays in the completion of the Project; claim for a refund of the portion of the additional preliminaries it paid to the defendant for 133 days of delay only allowed.
10	Sinco Technologies v Singapore Chi Cheng: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 26 Sep 2017 Sinco Technologies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Stayed	26 Sep 2017	Sinco Technologies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Proceedings StayedThe plaintiff's claim was stayed, and the plaintiff was ordered to commence proceedings afresh in Zhuhai.
11	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute 31 May 2016 Harianty Wibawa (Defendant)Won	31 May 2016	Harianty Wibawa (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the first defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Dynasty Line v. Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Liability in Share Pledge 28 Apr 2014 Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	28 Apr 2014	Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in partCivil Appeal No 105 of 2013 allowed. Damages available to Dynasty to the extent that we have found these are claimable against Sia and Lee for their breaches of fiduciary duty will be assessed by a High Court judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses 25 Feb 2014 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Lost	25 Feb 2014	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; BRE's claim against KSE was unsuccessful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	BR Energy v KS Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement for WPU Construction 19 Mar 2013 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Mar 2013	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff on liabilityJudgment in favour of BRE on liability with costs. BRE's claim for damages is to be assessed by the Registrar. The question of interest, if any, is also reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Kosui Singapore v Kamigumi: Labor Subcontract Dispute over Universal Studios Singapore Project 04 Mar 2012 Kamigumi Co Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Mar 2012	Kamigumi Co Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for $125,149.87 (inclusive of GST) against the Plaintiff in respect of the Defendants’ counter claim for the payment by the 1st Defendant to K2 Specialist Services Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Defendant)Partial	17 May 2011	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment to the first plaintiff for damages of $100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Mühlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Validity & Infringement 22 Feb 2010 Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2010	Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed and the respondent was ordered to pay costs.
18	Car & Cars v Volkswagen: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2009 Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2009	Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
19	Car & Cars v Volkswagen: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 02 Apr 2009 Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Apr 2009	Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for stay allowedThe plaintiff's action against the second defendant was stayed in favor of arbitration.
20	Muhlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity of Device for Inspecting Electronic Components 22 Feb 2009 Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2009	Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for invalidity and revocation of the plaintiff's patent was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	MEA Environment v 800 Super Waste Management: Liquidated Damages & Penalty Clauses 21 Sep 2008 800 Super Waste Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2008	800 Super Waste Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for liquidated damages was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Gnaguru v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 28 Feb 2008 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	28 Feb 2008	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society initially objected but withdrew its objection after the applicant agreed to certain conditions. No order as to costs was made as neither the Attorney-General nor the Law Society had sought costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction 11 Sep 2006 PT Siak Raya Timber (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Sep 2006	PT Siak Raya Timber (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
24	Gnaguru s/o Thamboo Mylvaganam v Law Society: Application for Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 16 Aug 2004 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	16 Aug 2004	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society did not object to the application. No order as to costs was made.
25	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Sale of Goods, Metal Transactions & Liquidator's Rights 10 Jun 2004 RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	10 Jun 2004	RBG Resources plc (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartRBG's claim was allowed, save for one drum of nickel. The sale proceeds of RBG’s metals are to be released to RBG or its solicitors, as RBG’s solicitors may direct. Damages to be paid to RBG for conversion of the nickel briquettes are the net purchase price or prices which CL has obtained for the same. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.