Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd

Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms.

Legal Representation

Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.2
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost42.3 parties avg
Neutral12.0 parties avg
Partial12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201513.0 parties avg
201412.0 parties avg
201312.0 parties avg
201012.0 parties avg
200812.0 parties avg
200712.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost4(66.7%)
Neutral1(16.7%)
Partial1(16.7%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD260,718.153 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20151
1
20141
1
20131
1
20101
1
20081
1
20071
1

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
21 Jun 2015
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
04 Sep 2014
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $500 to the Government for costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18 Feb 2013
Plaintiff, RespondentLostPlaintiff's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was dismissed with costs to the defendant.
07 Apr 2010
PlaintiffPartialFinal judgment against the defendant in the sums of $771,630.97 and $10,023.49 (for variation claims). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
09 Dec 2008
PlaintiffNeutralPlaintiff successfully resisted the defendant's application for security for costs.
12 Nov 2007
PlaintiffLostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant.