HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd

HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
PRP Law LLC	1 case	Pradeep Pillai Pillai Pradeep G Lin Shuling Joycelyn Wong Shi Rui Jonas Jonas Wong Joycelyn Lin Lek Haokai Lek Hao Kai

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33.3%
Won	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33.3%
	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	36.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%
	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%) : 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-87 07 Sep 2021	07 Sep 2021	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	2021-sgca-85 29 Aug 2021	29 Aug 2021	Respondent	Unknown
3	2021-sghc-86 14 Apr 2021	14 Apr 2021	Applicant	LostThe shareholders' application to set aside the sale of the asset to Golden Hill Capital and direct the JMs to accept Man Wah's offer was dismissed.