Jannie Chan Siew Lee
Jannie Chan Siew Lee is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 28.6% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Jannie Chan Siew Lee has been represented by 4 law firms and 6 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| LawCraft LLC | 1 case |
| Eugene Thuraisingam LLP | 2 cases |
| Eugene Thuraisingam | 1 case |
| Bachoo Mohan Singh Law Practice | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Jannie Chan Siew Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.6
- Complex Cases
- 2 (28.6%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 63.7 parties avg |
| Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2019 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2014 | 110.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Jannie Chan Siew Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 6(85.7%) |
| Partial | 1(14.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 10,600.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 1 |
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
| 2014 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
18 Feb 2025 | Defendant | LostThe bankrupt's application to set aside the private trustee in bankruptcy’s partial admission of a proof of debt filed by SME Care Pte Ltd was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Sep 2019 | Appellant, Defendant, Applicant | LostAppeal against the lifting of the suspension order was dismissed. Ordered to pay the respondent costs fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. This will be paid out of the said security deposit and the balance thereafter will be refunded to the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Apr 2018 | Defendant, Respondent | LostThe plaintiff is at liberty to enter the consent judgment under the settlement agreement. |
14 Aug 2017 | Defendant | PartialCounterclaim in [8(a)] and [8(b)] above was dismissed, but her counterclaim in [8(g)] above, in that she is automatically reinstated as a permanent Governing Director of TYC, was allowed. As for clause 10 of the SSD, this remains operable because of JC’s reinstatement as a permanent Governing Director of TYC. Hence no order was made on JC’s counterclaim in [8(c)] and [8(d)] above. |
05 Apr 2016 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs of $20,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. |
14 Jun 2015 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's applications to extend time and set aside the Statutory Demand were dismissed with costs of $3000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
09 Oct 2014 | Defendant | LostRequired to pay TYC $20,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |