Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed
Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 12 complex cases, representing 92.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed has been represented by 5 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Continental Law LLP | 1 case |
| J P Dendroff & Co | 1 case |
| Infinitus Law Corporation | 1 case |
| K K Cheng Law LLC | 2 cases |
| KK Cheng Law LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 17.2
- Complex Cases
- 12 (92.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1020.0 parties avg |
| Neutral | 28.0 parties avg |
| 18.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 132.0 parties avg |
| 2024 | 415.3 parties avg |
| 2023 | 221.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 417.3 parties avg |
| 2021 | 118.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 10(76.9%) |
| Neutral | 2(15.4%) |
| 1(7.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 15,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 1 |
| 2024 | 3 121 |
| 2023 | 1 2 |
| 2022 | 1 4 |
| 2021 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 13 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
04 Feb 2025 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
07 Nov 2024 | Other | NeutralThe real parties in interest are the Claimants, and ordinarily, they should bear the costs. However, in the present circumstances, the court makes no order as to costs. |
24 Sep 2024 | Other | Unknown |
26 Mar 2024 | Appellant, Applicant | LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. |
29 Jan 2024 | Other | NeutralOutcome for Jumaat is neutral in this application for ad hoc admission. |
04 Dec 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
24 May 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication for reinstatement of appeal and extension of time to file documents was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2022 | Claimant | LostApplication for a declaration that the Presumptions contained in Section 18(1) and 18(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 which were imposed upon the Claimants should be read down and given effect as imposing an evidential burden only in Compliance with Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Constitution and the Common law Presumption of innocence was dismissed. |
03 Aug 2022 | Appellant, Claimant | LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed. |
22 Jun 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 May 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Dec 2021 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed. |
05 Aug 2018 | Defendant | LostThe accused was sentenced to death for drug trafficking. |