Kiri Industries Limited

Kiri Industries Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Kiri Industries Limited has been represented by 1 law firm and 14 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	Dhillon Dinesh Singh Loong Tse Chuan Lim Dao Kai Mak Sushan Melissa Dhivya Rajendra Naidu Chee Yi Wen Serene Jung Sol Bryan Wong Shi-Wen Ling Ying Ming Daniel Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei Dinesh Dhillon Singh Dhivya Naidu Teh Shi Ying Elyssa Lee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kiri Industries Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (57.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	42.9%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	28.6%
Won	27.0 parties avg	7.0	28.6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	45.5 parties avg	5.5
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kiri Industries Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(42.9%)	42.9%
Partial	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Won	2(28.6%)	28.6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	94,837.40	31,612.473 cases	3
USD	678,480.50	678,480.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 211	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sgcai-1 30 Jan 2025	30 Jan 2025	Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part, with Senda liable to reimburse Kiri’s costs fixed at S$90,000.00, and Kiri’s disbursements of S$4,837.40. Discretionary enhancement of the sum to be paid to Kiri following the en bloc sale, calculated at 5.33% per annum on US$603.8m running from 3 September 2023 until the date of payment. That sum, as with the Valuation figure, will be paid to Kiri in priority as against Senda out of the net proceeds of the en bloc sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2023-sgcai-3 13 Apr 2023	13 Apr 2023	Appellant, Respondent	LostKiri's appeal (CA 57) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2020-sgcai-5 18 Oct 2020	18 Oct 2020	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; damages calculation adjusted in favor of Kiri Industries Limited. Kiri to obtain 50% of the costs of its appeal. No change to the assessment of DyStar's costs below. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2020-sghci-7 02 Mar 2020	02 Mar 2020	Defendant	LostJudgment against the defendant in the amount of USD 678,480.50.
5	2020-sgcai-1 11 Feb 2020	11 Feb 2020	Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	WonKiri was entitled to full costs on its claim in Suit 4.
6	2020-sghci-1 08 Jan 2020	08 Jan 2020	Defendant	LostDamages assessed against Kiri for breach of contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2019-sghci-2 11 Mar 2019	11 Mar 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	WonKiri was entitled to full costs on its claim in Suit 4. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.