Koh Kim Teck
Koh Kim Teck is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Koh Kim Teck has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Cairnhill Law LLC | 2 cases |
Optimus Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Koh Kim Teck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.3
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 32.3 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 22.0 parties avg |
2019 | 13.0 parties avg |
2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Koh Kim Teck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(75.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 9,333.333 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 2 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
09 Dec 2020 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs of $24,000 (including disbursements) to be paid by the appellant to the respondent. The usual consequential orders are to apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
28 Apr 2020 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to be paid to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Mar 2019 | Plaintiff | LostClaim dismissed; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Feb 2015 | Plaintiff, Respondent | WonThe Plaintiff's claim was not struck out, and the Defendant's appeal was dismissed. |