Law Society

Law Society is a association in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 12.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Law Society has been represented by 5 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	2 cases	Harjean Kaur Christopher Anand Daniel
Rodyk & Davidson	2 cases	Lok Vi Ming
KhattarWong LLP	1 case	P E Ashokan
Aziz Tayabali & Associates	1 case	Aziz Tayabali
Law Society	1 case	Pradeep Kumar Cho Sooi Yoon

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Law Society's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 4 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	12.5%
Neutral	63.8 parties avg	3.8	75.0%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	12.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2001	53.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Law Society's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Neutral	6(75.0%)	75.0%
Won	1(12.5%)	12.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 41	Neutral: 4 cases (200.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-28 16 Feb 2017	16 Feb 2017	Other	NeutralThe Law Society opposed the applications.
2	2013-sghc-177 16 Sep 2013	16 Sep 2013	Respondent	LostThe Law Society opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.
3	2013-sgca-45 18 Aug 2013	18 Aug 2013	Other	NeutralThe Law Society took a neutral position, representing that the proper course was for the Appellants to make their submissions to the Disciplinary Tribunal for its consideration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2001-sghc-219 13 Aug 2001	13 Aug 2001	Respondent	NeutralThe Law Society was a respondent in the application.
5	2001-sghc-128 05 Jul 2001	05 Jul 2001	Other	NeutralOutcome for the Law Society is not specified in the provided text.
6	2001-sghc-174 05 Jul 2001	05 Jul 2001	Respondent	NeutralNo outcome provided in the text.
7	2001-sghc-160 29 Jun 2001	29 Jun 2001	Applicant	WonThe Law Society's application to strike off the respondent was granted, with costs awarded to the Law Society. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	2001-sghc-47 12 Mar 2001	12 Mar 2001	Respondent	NeutralThe Law Society was a respondent in the application. The outcome of the application was neutral to their role.