Lew Kiat Beng

Lew Kiat Beng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lew Kiat Beng has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Lok Vi Ming SC Chu Hua Yi Audrey Chiang Edric Pan
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation	4 cases	Foo Soon Yien Daniel Tay Faizal Shah Petrina Lee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lew Kiat Beng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20.0%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20.0%
Won	36.0 parties avg	6.0	60.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lew Kiat Beng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	3(60.0%)	60.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sgca-61 20 Nov 2011	20 Nov 2011	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs to the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2011-sghc-143 01 Jun 2011	01 Jun 2011	Defendant	LostAppeal allowed, ordering the defendants to give access to such documents that are in their possession, control and power. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2009-sghc-225 30 Sep 2009	30 Sep 2009	Defendant	WonAppeal dismissed against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2009-sghc-223 29 Sep 2009	29 Sep 2009	Respondent	PartialLeave granted to bring action against him on some complaints.
5	2008-sghc-187 29 Oct 2008	29 Oct 2008	Defendant	WonDefendants' application to strike out paragraphs 22 to 28 and prayer 12 of the Statement of Claim was granted.