Lim Jit Ming Bryan

Lim Jit Ming Bryan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Lim Jit Ming Bryan has been represented by 1 law firm and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	Cavinder Bull Lin Shumin Woo Shu Yan Tan Yuan Kheng Cavinder Bull SC Vikram Raja Rajaram Priscilla Lua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Jit Ming Bryan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40.0%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	60.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Jit Ming Bryan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Won	3(60.0%)	60.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sgca-13 11 Mar 2015	11 Mar 2015	Respondent, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed regarding the existence of a settlement agreement. The court found that a settlement agreement existed but was repudiated by the other party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2014-sghc-77 15 Apr 2014	15 Apr 2014	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2011-sgca-62 17 Nov 2011	17 Nov 2011	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2011-sghc-120 15 May 2011	15 May 2011	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's appeal.
5	2010-sghc-35 28 Jan 2010	28 Jan 2010	Defendant	WonApplication to strike out paragraphs in the Statement of Claim and affidavit was granted.