Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd
Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Infinitus Law Corporation | 3 cases |
Kenneth Tan Partnership | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 23.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 13.0 parties avg |
2006 | 23.0 parties avg |
2005 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(50.0%) |
Partial | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 1 1 |
2006 | 2 11 |
2005 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
11 Apr 2007 | Defendant | LostThe defendant's claim that the patent was invalid was dismissed. |
09 Oct 2006 | Appellant | WonApplication to adduce new evidence was allowed, and the case was remitted to the trial judge. |
26 Jan 2006 | Defendant | LostJudgment against the Defendant; an injunction is granted to restrain Mariwu from infringing the patent, and there will be an inquiry as to the damages suffered by Dextra as a result of the infringement. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Apr 2005 | Defendant | PartialApplication to re-amend their amended defence to include further instances of prior art was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |