Maybank Singapore Limited
Maybank Singapore Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Maybank Singapore Limited has been represented by 5 law firms and 7 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
| Withers KhattarWong LLP | 1 case |
| Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
| Adsan Law LLC | 1 case |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Maybank Singapore Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.9
- Complex Cases
- 4 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
| Neutral | 28.0 parties avg |
| Won | 46.5 parties avg |
| 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 55.4 parties avg |
| 2023 | 29.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Maybank Singapore Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(12.5%) |
| Neutral | 2(25.0%) |
| Won | 4(50.0%) |
| 1(12.5%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 94,435.102 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 221 |
| 2023 | 1 2 |
| 2022 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 8 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
09 Sep 2024 | Respondent | WonCosts of $2,000 awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Aug 2024 | Claimant | WonWinding up order granted against the defendant. The defendant was indebted to it in the sum of $186,870.19 (excluding interest) under a “Micro Loan Account”. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Aug 2024 | Other | Unknown |
17 Jun 2024 | Non-party | NeutralThe court did not make the Disclosure and Examination Order against Maybank because it did not think it was necessary to do so at this juncture. The court was of the view that, upon this court’s recognition of the BVI Liquidation and of the Joint Liquidators as the foreign representatives, Maybank, as the bankers of FCL, would be obliged to provide FCL’s information and documents to the Joint Liquidators. The Joint Liquidators were entitled to seek further orders if necessary. |
25 Feb 2024 | Respondent | NeutralMaybank did not take a position on the applications. |
11 Sep 2023 | Claimant | WonCWU 87 is allowed. |
23 Feb 2023 | Other | WonOpposed the JM Applications. |
23 Jun 2022 | Plaintiff | LostMaybank cannot proceed with OS 245 without taking steps to appoint a person to represent the Estate. Maybank is to bear its own costs for SUM 1212. |