Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd
Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 80.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 11 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen and Gledhill | 1 case |
Rajah and Tann | 1 case |
Rajah & Tann | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 6.2
- Complex Cases
- 4 (80.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 37.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 18.0 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2006 | 15.0 parties avg |
2004 | 46.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(60.0%) |
Neutral | 1(20.0%) |
Won | 1(20.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2006 | 1 1 |
2004 | 3 211 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 May 2006 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostThe bank's appeal for production of the PWC Draft Reports was dismissed. |
02 Sep 2004 | Respondent | NeutralThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal. |
30 Jul 2004 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed in favour of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Jul 2004 | Applicant | LostThe appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
03 Jun 2004 | Defendant | LostOrders in favor of Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |