Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd

Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 80.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 11 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
6.2
Complex Cases
4 (80.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost37.0 parties avg
Neutral18.0 parties avg
Won12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200615.0 parties avg
200446.5 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(60.0%)
Neutral1(20.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.003 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20061
1
20043
211

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
30 May 2006
Plaintiff, AppellantLostThe bank's appeal for production of the PWC Draft Reports was dismissed.
02 Sep 2004
RespondentNeutralThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
30 Jul 2004
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed in favour of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27 Jul 2004
ApplicantLostThe appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
03 Jun 2004
DefendantLostOrders in favor of Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).