Monetary Authority of Singapore
Monetary Authority of Singapore is a government agency in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Monetary Authority of Singapore has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 4 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Monetary Authority of Singapore's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.6
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 52.6 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
2013 | 13.0 parties avg |
2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
2010 | 22.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Monetary Authority of Singapore's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 5(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 126,750.004 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 1 1 |
2013 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Oct 2017 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; civil penalties increased for both respondents; costs of the appeal fixed at $7,000 to be paid by the Respondents to the Appellant, with reasonable disbursements in addition. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Nov 2013 | Plaintiff | WonPermanent injunction granted against the defendants. |
09 Feb 2012 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Sep 2010 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the plaintiff; civil penalties of $250,000 each were imposed on the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 May 2010 | Plaintiff | WonThe court found that MAS has satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, the requisite elements to make out the claim for insider trading under s 218 of the SFA against Lew. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore). |