Nazeri bin Lajim

Nazeri bin Lajim is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Nazeri bin Lajim has been represented by 5 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
S Skandarajah & Co	1 case	Skandarajah s/o Selvarajah
Carson Law Chambers	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy
K K Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
James Masih & Company	1 case	Masih James Bahadur

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nazeri bin Lajim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.5
Complex Cases: 3 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	610.5 parties avg	10.5	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	313.3 parties avg	13.3
2021	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nazeri bin Lajim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sgca-55 20 Jul 2022	20 Jul 2022	Appellant, Applicant	LostThe appellant's appeal was dismissed, and the application for a stay of execution was also dismissed.
2	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
5	2021-sgca-41 19 Apr 2021	19 Apr 2021	Applicant	LostThe court dismissed the application for review summarily, finding no sufficient material to conclude that there had been a miscarriage of justice.
6	2017-sghc-226 20 Sep 2017	20 Sep 2017	Defendant	LostConvicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.