NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited
NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited has been represented by 4 law firms and 10 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
Legal Solutions LLC | 1 case |
Helen Yeo & Partners | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.5
- Complex Cases
- 3 (75.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 23.5 parties avg |
Won | 25.5 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 13.0 parties avg |
2015 | 15.0 parties avg |
2011 | 14.0 parties avg |
2000 | 16.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 2(50.0%) |
Won | 2(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 25.004 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2011 | 1 1 |
2000 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
31 Mar 2022 | Intervener | PartialThe intervener successfully argued against some of the appellant's claims, but was ultimately liable to pay for the damages awarded for personal injury under the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act. |
19 Aug 2015 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; costs to the respondent fixed at $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 May 2011 | Defendant | PartialJudgment to the first plaintiff for damages of $100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Sep 2000 | Defendant | WonJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed. |