Official Receiver

Official Receiver is a government agency in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 40.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Official Receiver has been represented by 6 law firms and 10 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Official Receiver's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
4.4
Complex Cases
4 (40.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost13.0 parties avg
Neutral74.6 parties avg
Won13.0 parties avg
16.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202517.0 parties avg
202443.3 parties avg
202326.0 parties avg
202216.0 parties avg
200023.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Official Receiver's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(10.0%)
Neutral7(70.0%)
Won1(10.0%)
1(10.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.003 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20251
1
20241
4
20231
2
20221
1
20002
11

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
27 Jan 2025
OtherNeutralThe Official Receiver was present at the hearing.
12 Nov 2024
Non-partyNeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party providing input on a technical issue.
05 Nov 2024
Non-partyNeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party to the proceedings.
26 Sep 2024
Non-partyNeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party to the application.
27 Aug 2024
Non-partyNeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party to the application.
14 Nov 2023
OtherNeutralThe Official Receiver was present in court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 Nov 2023
Non-partyNeutralOfficial Receiver was a non-party in this case (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19 Sep 2022
OtherUnknown
30 Oct 2000
RespondentLostThe appeal was allowed, and the order below was set aside.
21 Jun 2000
DefendantWonThe application against the Official Receiver was dismissed.