Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd

Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Chan Tan LLC	1 case	Neo Kim Cheng Monica
Chan Neo LLP	1 case	Teo Kah Wee
ChanTan LLC	1 case	Monica Neo George Tan
Chan Tan & Partners	1 case	Monica Neo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,028.50	10,009.503 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-247 06 Nov 2016	06 Nov 2016	Defendant	WonThe application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 (inclusive of disbursements). The court also ordered payment out to the defendant of the sum paid into court by the plaintiff. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay to the defendant the sum of $4,534.13 as the plaintiff’s share of the adjudication costs and interest at 5.33% of the adjudicated amount of $70,865.45 from 31 May 2016 to the date of full payment of the adjudicated amount. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2005-sghc-33 14 Feb 2005	14 Feb 2005	Applicant	PartialCertain matters remitted to the arbitrator for reconsideration.
3	2002-sgca-21 03 Apr 2002	03 Apr 2002	Respondent	LostApplication to set aside the notice of appeal was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2001-sghc-386 29 Nov 2001	29 Nov 2001	Defendant	PartialThe defendants are entitled to judgment on their counterclaim save for the claim for sealant works. Accordingly, I award them final judgment in the sum of $30,028.50 and interlocutory judgment for the claim for clearance of debris, based strictly on reimbursement to the defendants of backcharges imposed by Sato for this item. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.