Pradeepto Kumar Biswas

Pradeepto Kumar Biswas is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 42.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Pradeepto Kumar Biswas has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WNLEX LLC	1 case	Samantha Ong Xin Ying Kelvin Lee Ming Hui
Carson Law Chambers	3 cases	Lim Tean
Sterling Law Corporation	1 case	Sankar s/o Kailasa Thevar Saminathan
Niru & Co LLC	1 case	Liew Teck Huat Kenneth Yap Christopher Yee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pradeepto Kumar Biswas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (42.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.8 parties avg	3.8	85.7%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pradeepto Kumar Biswas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(85.7%)	85.7%
Won	1(14.3%)	14.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	410,312.64	68,385.446 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghca-3 30 Jan 2024	30 Jan 2024	Applicant	LostEOT Application dismissed with costs to the Respondents on an indemnity basis fixed at $12,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2023-sghc-262 14 Sep 2023	14 Sep 2023	Defendant, Appellant, Claimant	LostSUM 2247, SUM 268, RA 343, RA 344, and RA 348 dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sgca-63 29 Sep 2022	29 Sep 2022	Applicant	LostApplication for recusal and permission to appeal dismissed; costs of S$12,000 for OA 2 and S$20,000 on an indemnity basis for SUM 15 awarded to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2022-sgca-31 10 Apr 2022	10 Apr 2022	Applicant	LostApplication for a new trial was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction, absence of merit, and abuse of process. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2019-sgca-79 28 Nov 2019	28 Nov 2019	Respondent, Appellant	LostCivil Appeal No 2 of 2019 was struck out, and costs of $15,000 (all-in) were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2019-sghc-183 07 Aug 2019	07 Aug 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim	WonThe plaintiff's claim for deferred salary of $351,312.64 is allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2018-sghc-271 10 Dec 2018	10 Dec 2018	Defendant	LostJudgment against the defendant; damages awarded. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore, as the judgment originates from Singapore.)