Projector SA

Projector SA is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Projector SA has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rodyk and Davidson	1 case	Kelvin Poon Sean La’Brooy Lok Vi Ming Lawrence Teh Govindarajalu Asokan Govind Asokan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Projector SA's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 1 (20.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	60.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Projector SA's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60.0%)	60.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2008-sghc-234 11 Dec 2008	11 Dec 2008	Respondent	LostProjector SA was ordered to be wound up.
2	2005-sgca-5 24 Jan 2005	24 Jan 2005	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	2004-sgca-58 02 Dec 2004	02 Dec 2004	Appellant, Defendant	WonAppeal allowed; order made on 16 July 2004 by Woo J set aside. Leave granted to amend notice of appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2004-sghc-179 15 Aug 2004	15 Aug 2004	Defendant	PartialInterim mandatory injunction discharged; decision on costs and inquiry as to damages reserved to the trial judge.
5	2004-sgca-34 10 Aug 2004	10 Aug 2004	Appellant	LostProjector SA's application to amend the notice of appeal was dismissed, and Projector SA was ordered to pay the costs of the application. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.