PT Bayan Resources TBK

PT Bayan Resources TBK is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 19 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

PT Bayan Resources TBK has been represented by 2 law firms and 19 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	Jaikanth Shankar Davinder Singh Jerrie Tan Davinder Singh SC Teo Li Fang Tony Yeo Chan Yong Wei Lydia Ni Harsharan Kaur Lydia Ni Man Chuo Phang Hwee Guang
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	4 cases	Jaikanth Shankar Davinder Singh s/o Amar Singh SC Rajvinder Singh Chahal Tan Ruo Yu Ayana Ki Davinder Singh Tan Mao Lin Amarpall Singh Irina Golovkovskaya Darren Low

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of PT Bayan Resources TBK's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 7 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	28.6%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	28.6%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	42.9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of PT Bayan Resources TBK's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Partial	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Won	3(42.9%)	42.9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,694,633.20	1,173,658.304 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgcai-8 22 Oct 2023	22 Oct 2023	Respondent, Defendant	PartialPost-transfer costs reduced due to increased discount from 40% to 70%.
2	2023-sgcai-1 09 Feb 2023	09 Feb 2023	Respondent, Defendant	WonAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2022-sghci-17 18 Dec 2022	18 Dec 2022	Defendant	WonJudgment for Defendant; Plaintiffs to pay costs of S$2,761,787 and disbursements of S$1,932,846.20, subject to simple interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2022-sghci-2 06 Feb 2022	06 Feb 2022	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of PT Bayan Resources TBK. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2019-sghci-1 08 Jan 2019	08 Jan 2019	Defendant	LostThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
6	2018-sgcai-6 28 Aug 2018	28 Aug 2018	Appellant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Defendant	PartialAppeal dismissed in part; the question of whether BCBCS had the ability to fund KSC on its own is remitted to the Court for determination.
7	2017-sghci-6 24 Jul 2017	24 Jul 2017	Defendant	LostThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.