Quo Vadis Investments Limited

Quo Vadis Investments Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Quo Vadis Investments Limited has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	1 case	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel Harjean Kaur Christopher Anand Daniel Keith Valentine Lee Jia Jin Christopher Anand R Shriveena Naidu

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quo Vadis Investments Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 6 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%
Won	35.3 parties avg	5.3	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quo Vadis Investments Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	3(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	392,340.78	78,468.165 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghci-12 25 Aug 2022	25 Aug 2022	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiffs to pay the defendants S$392,340.78 inclusive of GST and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sghci-7 24 Apr 2022	24 Apr 2022	Plaintiff	LostThe defendants' application for indemnity costs was refused, and the defendants must pay the plaintiffs’ costs which may be set off against the costs payable by the plaintiffs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sghci-4 20 Feb 2022	20 Feb 2022	Plaintiff	LostClaim for rescission of agreements, return of purchase price, and damages was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2021-sgcai-1 09 Feb 2021	09 Feb 2021	Respondent	WonClaims against Quo Vadis Investments Limited dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2020-sghci-24 23 Nov 2020	23 Nov 2020	Plaintiff	WonApplication for security of costs was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
6	2020-sghci-2 04 Feb 2020	04 Feb 2020	Defendant	WonThe action against the defendant was dismissed.