Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is a limited liability partnership in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 71.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
LVM Law Chambers LLC	2 cases	Lok Vi Ming SC Pak Waltan Zhuang Wenxiong Wong Xiao Wei Clara Lim Ai Ying
Colin Liew LLC	5 cases	Liew Wey-Ren Colin Toby Thomas Landau Toby Landau QC
Essex Court Chambers Duxton	2 cases	Toby Landau QC

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 4 (57.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	28.6%
Won	53.6 parties avg	3.6	71.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2021	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Won	5(71.4%)	71.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,000.00	20,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sgca-54 24 Nov 2024	24 Nov 2024	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; the Henderson doctrine was inapplicable, and there was no general abuse of process.
2	2023-sghc-222 14 Aug 2023	14 Aug 2023	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sgca-40 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Respondent	WonOriginating Summons dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
4	2022-sgca-28 03 Apr 2022	03 Apr 2022	Respondent	WonAppeal won; costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by Mr CM Lim and Ms HC Lim personally. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2022-sgca-29 03 Apr 2022	03 Apr 2022	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; Rajah & Tann to pay the Lims $40,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2021-sghc-144 20 Jun 2021	20 Jun 2021	Respondent	WonSuccessfully defended against the injunction applications. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2021-sghc-47 24 Feb 2021	24 Feb 2021	Respondent	WonStriking-Out applications allowed; costs awarded to Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP.