Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd

Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
K&L Gates Stratis Law	1 case	Lim Min
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	Lim Min Narayanan Sreenivasan N Sreenivasan Shankar s/o Angammah Sevasamy Ow Yan Rong Derek Qiu Jiehao Ivan Derek Ow
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 case	Narayanan Sreenivasan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14.3%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	42.9%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	42.9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Partial	3(42.9%)	42.9%
Won	3(42.9%)	42.9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,009,060.18	1,502,265.054 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 12	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghc-51 26 Feb 2024	26 Feb 2024	Other	NeutralTook no position on the winding up.
2	2020-sgca-40 23 Apr 2020	23 Apr 2020	Respondent	WonCosts for the application fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements were awarded to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2018-sgca-58 01 Oct 2018	01 Oct 2018	Appellant, Respondent	PartialRWS's appeal was allowed in part, modifying the cost orders to reflect that Mr. Goel should bear 80% of SATS's costs in the third-party proceedings.
4	2018-sghc-173 30 Jul 2018	30 Jul 2018	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $5,930,595.00 plus interest (currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2018-sghc-100 26 Apr 2018	26 Apr 2018	Plaintiff	WonDefendant's appeals and application to adduce further evidence dismissed.
6	2017-sghc-43 08 Mar 2017	08 Mar 2017	Defendant	PartialLiable for 80% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff, amounting to $36,732.59. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
7	2015-sghc-289 03 Nov 2015	03 Nov 2015	Defendant	PartialJudgment against the defendant in part. The Casino is liable for $36,732.59, that being 80% of the total damages that I have awarded (ie, $45,915.74). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.