Samsung C&T Corporation
Samsung C&T Corporation is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Samsung C&T Corporation has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC | 1 case |
Eldan Law LLP | 2 cases |
Holborn Law LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Samsung C&T Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.8
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 23.0 parties avg |
Won | 32.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 13.0 parties avg |
2019 | 23.0 parties avg |
2018 | 22.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Samsung C&T Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(40.0%) |
Won | 3(60.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 25,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 1 |
2019 | 2 11 |
2018 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2020 | Appellant, Defendant | LostSamsung's appeal was dismissed with costs. |
11 Nov 2019 | Defendant | LostThe court found the call on the performance bond unconscionable and granted an injunction against Samsung C&T Corporation. |
29 May 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which included the disbursements and the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal. |
02 Sep 2018 | Defendant | WonThe court lifted the interim injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from paying out on a banker’s guarantee issued in favour of the 1st defendant and to prevent the 1st defendant from receiving payment of the same. |
08 Jul 2018 | Respondent | WonAppeal upheld; Samsung awarded costs in the sum of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |