Samsung C&T Corporation

Samsung C&T Corporation is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Samsung C&T Corporation has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samsung C&T Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.8
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost23.0 parties avg
Won32.7 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202013.0 parties avg
201923.0 parties avg
201822.5 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samsung C&T Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Won3(60.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD25,000.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20201
1
20192
11
20181
2

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
16 Aug 2020
Appellant, DefendantLostSamsung's appeal was dismissed with costs.
11 Nov 2019
DefendantLostThe court found the call on the performance bond unconscionable and granted an injunction against Samsung C&T Corporation.
29 May 2019
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which included the disbursements and the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal.
02 Sep 2018
DefendantWonThe court lifted the interim injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from paying out on a banker’s guarantee issued in favour of the 1st defendant and to prevent the 1st defendant from receiving payment of the same.
08 Jul 2018
RespondentWonAppeal upheld; Samsung awarded costs in the sum of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).