Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd
Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 2 cases |
MPillay | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.5
- Complex Cases
- 1 (25.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 14.0 parties avg |
Won | 32.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2015 | 23.0 parties avg |
2011 | 12.0 parties avg |
2008 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 3(75.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2015 | 2 11 |
2011 | 1 1 |
2008 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
15 Dec 2015 | Applicant | NeutralThe court refused to set aside the orders for meetings to be held under s 210(1) of the Companies Act. |
22 Sep 2015 | Applicant | WonThe company's application under s 210(1) of the Companies Act was allowed, with a modification to convene the meeting within four months. |
27 Feb 2011 | Defendant | WonPlaintiff's application to stop the arbitration was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
09 Dec 2008 | Plaintiff | WonPlaintiff's application to stay the defendant's counterclaim was allowed. |