Seventh defendant
Seventh defendant is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Seventh defendant has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann LLP | 1 case |
Haridass Ho & Partners | 1 case |
Engelin Teh & Partners | 1 case |
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Seventh defendant's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 10.0
- Complex Cases
- 3 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 114.0 parties avg |
Won | 28.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2015 | 18.0 parties avg |
2010 | 18.0 parties avg |
2001 | 114.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Seventh defendant's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 3,500,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2015 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
2001 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
26 Jul 2015 | Defendant | WonThe court declined to grant a Mareva injunction against the seventh defendant. |
02 May 2010 | Respondent, Defendant | WonPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Dec 2001 | Defendant | LostThe plaintiff company was given a declaration that the seventh defendant received $7m from the plaintiff company as constructive trustees and it should account for the use of this $7m including the outstanding amount of $1.5m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |