SIA Engineering Company Limited
SIA Engineering Company Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
SIA Engineering Company Limited has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Legal Solutions LLC | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of SIA Engineering Company Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2018 | 23.0 parties avg |
2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of SIA Engineering Company Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 1(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 68,725.623 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2018 | 2 11 |
2017 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
04 Sep 2018 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially unsuccessful; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements, and 60% of the appellant's costs below, assessed on a standard basis, to be taxed on the District Court scale if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Jul 2018 | Respondent | LostSIA Engineering Company Limited is vicariously liable for the negligence of its employee, Yap Tee Chuan, in the amount of $176,176.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
08 Oct 2017 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the defendant as the court found that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff. |